ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2024
Patterns of national emergency department utilization by fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with dementia.
Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Utilization Patterns Among Heterogeneous Subgroups of Homebound Older Adults: A Latent Class Analysis.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026Observational
- Predicting Mortality and Costs After Emergency Department Visits by People With Dementia: Timing and Location Matter.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026Article
- Patient characteristics and palliative care eligibility in public vs. private emergency care: A cross-sectional observational study.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIndividuals with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) often face high acute care clinical utilization and costs with unclear benefits in survival or quality of life. The emergency department (ED) is frequently the site of pivotal decisions in these acute care episodes. This study uses national Medicare data to explore this population's ED utilization.
methodsRetrospective cohort study of persons aged ≥66 years enrolled in traditional Medicare with a Chronic Condition Warehouse diagnosis of dementia. Primary 1-year outcome measures included ED visits with and without hospitalization, ED visits per 100 days alive, and health-care costs. A multivariate random effects regression model (clustered by county of residence), adjusted for sociodemographics and comorbidities, examined how place of care on January 1, 2018, was associated with subsequent ED utilization.
resultsIn 2018, 2,680,006 ADRD traditional Medicare patients (mean age 82.9, 64.2% female, 9.4% Black, 6.2% Hispanic) experienced a total of 3,234,767 ED visits. Over half (52.2%) of the cohort experienced one ED visit, 15.5% experienced three or more, and 37.1% of ED visits resulted in hospitalization. Compared with ADRD patients residing at home without services, the marginal difference in ED visits per 100 days alive varied by location of care. Highest differences were observed for those with hospitalizations (0.48 visits per 100 days alive, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47-0.49), skilled nursing facility (rehab/skilled nursing facility [SNF]) stays (0.27, 95% CI 0.27-0.28), home health stays (0.25, 95% CI 0.25-0.26), or observation stays (0.82, 95% CI 0.77-0.87). Similar patterns were observed with ED use without hospitalization and health-care costs.
conclusionsPersons with ADRD frequently use the ED-particularly those with recent hospitalizations, rehab/SNF stays, or home health use-and may benefit from targeted interventions during or before the ED encounters to reduce avoidable utilization and ensure goal-concordant care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.