Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38838170›Full record

Trial reportHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2024

Efficacy, reactogenicity, and safety of the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine for the prevention of herpes zoster in Chinese adults ≥ 50 years: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Diana Alexandra Echeverria Proano, Fengcai Zhu, Xiaodong Sun, Jesús Zoco, Jyoti Soni, Neeraj Parmar, S Omar Ali, Zoster-076 Study Group

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IV
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04869982 (A Phase IV, Randomized, Observer-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multi-center Study to Assess the Prophylactic Efficacy Against Herpes Zoster, Immunogenicity and Safety of Shingrix When Administered Intramuscularly on a 2-dose Schedule in Chinese Adults Aged 50 Years and Older), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04869982 phase4completednot on this map

A Phase IV, Randomized, Observer-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multi-center Study to Assess the Prophylactic Efficacy Against Herpes Zoster, Immunogenicity and Safety of Shingrix When Administered Intramuscularly on a 2-dose Schedule in Chinese Adults Aged 50 Years and Older

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2021 to 2023Enrolled6,138ConditionsHerpes ZosterArmsRZV, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Diana Alexandra Echeverria ProanoGSK, Wavre, Belgium.
Fengcai ZhuDepartment of Acute Infectious Disease Control and Prevention, Jiangsu Province Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, China.
Xiaodong SunDepartment of Immunization Program, Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, China.
Jesús ZocoGSK, Wavre, Belgium.
Jyoti SoniGSK, Wavre, Belgium.
Neeraj ParmarGSK, Bangalore, India.
S Omar AliGSK, Rockville, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3131-3299
Zoster-076 Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phase III multi-country studies (ZOE-50/70) demonstrated that the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) was well tolerated and prevented herpes zoster (HZ) in healthy ≥ 50-year-olds, with a vaccine efficacy (VE) > 90% across age groups. These pivotal trials did not enroll participants from mainland China where RZV is licensed, therefore similar clinical data are missing for this population. In this phase IV observer-blind study (NCT04869982) conducted between 2021 and 2023 in China, immunocompetent and medically stable ≥ 50-year-olds were randomized 1:1 to receive two RZV or placebo doses, 2 months apart. This study assessed the VE (overall, as confirmatory objective, and descriptively by age category [50-69-year-olds/≥ 70-year-olds]), reactogenicity, and safety of RZV in this Chinese population. Of the 6138 enrolled participants, 99.2% completed the study. During a mean follow-up period of 15.2 (±1.1) months, 31 HZ episodes were confirmed (RZV = 0; placebo = 31) for an incidence rate of 0.0 vs 8.2 per 1000 person-years and an overall VE of 100% (89.82-100). The descriptive VE was 100% (85.29-100) for 50-69-year-olds and 100% (60.90-100) for ≥ 70-year-olds. Solicited adverse events (AEs) were more frequent in the RZV vs the placebo group (median duration: 1-3 days for both groups). Pain and fatigue were the most frequent local and general AEs (RZV: 72.1% and 43.4%; placebo: 9.2% and 5.3%). The frequencies of unsolicited AEs, serious AEs, potential immune-mediated diseases, and deaths were similar between both groups. RZV is well tolerated and efficacious in preventing HZ in Chinese ≥ 50-year-olds, consistent with efficacy studies including worldwide populations with similar age and medical characteristics.

Indexed as

Herpes ZosterHerpes Zoster VaccineVaccines, SyntheticAdjuvants, ImmunologicAgedAged, 80 and overChinaEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedVaccine EfficacyAdjuvants, ImmunologicHerpes Zoster VaccineVaccines, Syntheticadjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccineHerpes zosterreactogenicitysafetyvaccine efficacy

Identifiers

PMID38838170
PMCPMC11253707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.