Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38838016›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

TULIP: A transformer-based unsupervised language model for interacting peptides and T cell receptors that generalizes to unseen epitopes.

Barthelemy Meynard-Piganeau, Christoph Feinauer, Martin Weigt, Aleksandra M Walczak, Thierry Mora

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Ensembles ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Leveraging Artificial Intelligence and Large Language Models for Cancer Immunotherapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Barthelemy Meynard-PiganeauLaboratory of Computational and Quantitative Biology, Institut de Biologie Paris Seine, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Paris 75005, France.
Christoph FeinauerDepartment of Computing Sciences, Bocconi University, Milan 20100, Italy.
Martin WeigtLaboratory of Computational and Quantitative Biology, Institut de Biologie Paris Seine, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Paris 75005, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0492-3684
Aleksandra M Walczak *Laboratoire de Physique de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure, Université Paris Sciences et Lettres, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris Cité, Paris 75005, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2686-5702
Thierry Mora *Laboratoire de Physique de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure, Université Paris Sciences et Lettres, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris Cité, Paris 75005, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5456-9361

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) ANR-19-CE45-0018EC | European Research Council (ERC) COG 724208
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accurate prediction of binding between T cell receptors (TCR) and their cognate epitopes is key to understanding the adaptive immune response and developing immunotherapies. Current methods face two significant limitations: the shortage of comprehensive high-quality data and the bias introduced by the selection of the negative training data commonly used in the supervised learning approaches. We propose a method, Transformer-based Unsupervised Language model for Interacting Peptides and T cell receptors (TULIP), that addresses both limitations by leveraging incomplete data and unsupervised learning and using the transformer architecture of language models. Our model is flexible and integrates all possible data sources, regardless of their quality or completeness. We demonstrate the existence of a bias introduced by the sampling procedure used in previous supervised approaches, emphasizing the need for an unsupervised approach. TULIP recognizes the specific TCRs binding an epitope, performing well on unseen epitopes. Our model outperforms state-of-the-art models and offers a promising direction for the development of more accurate TCR epitope recognition models.

Indexed as

PeptidesReceptors, Antigen, T-CellEpitopesEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHumansProtein BindingUnsupervised Machine LearningEpitopesEpitopes, T-LymphocytePeptidesReceptors, Antigen, T-Celllanguage models of proteinsprotein bindingT cell receptorT cell repertoireTCR–pMHC pair

Identifiers

PMID38838016
PMCPMC11181096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.