Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38837975›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Gene expression and anticancer evaluation of Kigelia africana (Lam.) Benth. Extracts using MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cell lines.

Aasia Kalsoom, Awais Altaf, Huma Sattar, Tahir Maqbool, Muhammad Sajjad, Muhammad Idrees Jilani, Ghulam Shabbir, Saira Aftab

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Phytochemical Profiling and Anticancer Potential ofAnti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry · 2026
    Article
  3. Integrative Evaluation ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Decoding the anticancer and biofilm-inhibiting efficacy ofFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aasia KalsoomInstitute of Molecular Biology (IMBB), Center for Research in Molecular Medicine (CRiMM), The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Awais AltafInstitute of Molecular Biology (IMBB), Center for Research in Molecular Medicine (CRiMM), The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Huma SattarInstitute of Molecular Biology (IMBB), Center for Research in Molecular Medicine (CRiMM), The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Tahir MaqboolInstitute of Molecular Biology (IMBB), Center for Research in Molecular Medicine (CRiMM), The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Muhammad SajjadSchool of Biological Sciences, Punjab University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Muhammad Idrees JilaniDepartment of Chemistry, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Ghulam ShabbirPakistan Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (PCSIR), Islamabad, Pakistan.
Saira AftabDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1875-8031

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, a cancer research trend has shifted towards identifying novel therapeutic compounds from natural assets for the management of cancer. In this study, we aimed to assess the cytotoxic activity of Kigelia Africana (KA) extracts on breast cancer (MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7) and noncancerous kidney cells (HEK-293T) to develop an efficient anticancer medication. We used gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS to analyze the constituents of EKA and HKA extracts meanwhile the crystal violet and the MTT (3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-Diphenyltetrazolium Bromide) assays were used to examine the possible cytotoxic effects of plant extracts on our cancer cell lines along with non-cancerous control. The quantitative real-time PCR (RT-PCR) was run on cell samples to evaluate the differential expression of cell proliferative markers of cancer (BCL-2 and TP53). These phytochemicals have been reported to have binding affinity for some other growth factors and receptors as well which was evaluated by the in-silico molecular docking against Bcl2, EGFR, HER2, and TP53. Our Morphological observation showed a significant difference in the cell morphology and proliferation potential which was decreased under the effect of plant extracts treatment as compared to the control samples. The ethanol extract exhibited a marked antiproliferative activity towards MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cell lines with IC50 = 20 and 32 μg/mL, respectively. Quantitative RT-PCR gene expression investigation revealed that the IC50 concentration of ethanolic extract regulated the levels of mRNA expression of apoptotic genes. With the target and active binding site amino acids discovered in the molecular docking investigation, TP53/Propanoic acid, 3-(2, 3, 6-trimethyl-1, 4-dioxaspiro [4.4] non-7-yl)-, methyl ester (-7.1 kcal/mol) is the best-docked ligand. The use of this plant in folk remedies justifies its high in vitro anti-cancer capabilities. This work highlights the role of phytochemicals in the inhibition of cancer proliferation. Based on all these findings, it can be concluded that EKA extract has promising anti-proliferative effect on cancerous cells but more study is required in future to further narrow down the active ingredients of total crude extract with specific targets in cancer cells.

Indexed as

Molecular Docking SimulationPlant ExtractsTumor Suppressor Protein p53Antineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHEK293 CellsHumansMCF-7 CellsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2Antineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicPlant ExtractsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2TP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID38837975
PMCPMC11152317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.