ReviewGigaScience2024
Future-proofing genomic data and consent management: a comprehensive review of technology innovations.
Review in GigaScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic study on blockchain technology for genomic data management in healthcare: approaches, challenges, and research opportunities.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of salinity on photosynthetic characteristics, rhizosphere microbial community structure, and diversity ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Integrating symptom science and precision health to enhance palliative care outcomes.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Methods for safely sharing dual-use genetic data.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Bioinformatics and artificial intelligence in genomic data analysis: current advances and future directions.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2025Review
- Epigenetic Alterations Induced by Smoking and Their Intersection with Artificial Intelligence: A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Review
- Article
- Optimizing UK biobank cloud-based research analysis platform to fine-map coronary artery disease loci in whole genome sequencing data.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Imaging genomics of cancer: a bibliometric analysis and review.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025Review
- Type-2 diabetes epigenetic biomarkers: present status and future directions for global and Indigenous health.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Review
- End-of-life in cancer patients: Medicolegal implications and ethical challenges in Europe.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomic information is increasingly used to inform medical treatments and manage future disease risks. However, any personal and societal gains must be carefully balanced against the risk to individuals contributing their genomic data. Expanding our understanding of actionable genomic insights requires researchers to access large global datasets to capture the complexity of genomic contribution to diseases. Similarly, clinicians need efficient access to a patient's genome as well as population-representative historical records for evidence-based decisions. Both researchers and clinicians hence rely on participants to consent to the use of their genomic data, which in turn requires trust in the professional and ethical handling of this information. Here, we review existing and emerging solutions for secure and effective genomic information management, including storage, encryption, consent, and authorization that are needed to build participant trust. We discuss recent innovations in cloud computing, quantum-computing-proof encryption, and self-sovereign identity. These innovations can augment key developments from within the genomics community, notably GA4GH Passports and the Crypt4GH file container standard. We also explore how decentralized storage as well as the digital consenting process can offer culturally acceptable processes to encourage data contributions from ethnic minorities. We conclude that the individual and their right for self-determination needs to be put at the center of any genomics framework, because only on an individual level can the received benefits be accurately balanced against the risk of exposing private information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.