ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2024
Reliability of energy landscape analysis of resting-state functional MRI data.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Personalized whole-brain Ising models with heterogeneous nodes capture differences among brain regions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Resting-state fMRI analysis of functional connectivity and temporal dynamics differences between cocaine users and healthy controls.Neuroimage. Reports · 2026Article
- Psychological distress among Japanese high school students during the COVID-19 pandemic: An energy landscape analysis.PLoS medicine · 2026Article
- Energy landscape and dynamic state modeling for schizophrenia biomarker extraction in task-based fMRI.PloS one · 2026Article
- From microstates to macroscales: A Critical Review of Maximum Entropy Modeling and Energy Landscape Analysis in functional MRI.Research square · 2025Article
- The role of structural connectivity on brain function through a Markov model of signal transmission.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Energy landscape analysis based on the Ising model: Tutorial review.PLOS complex systems · 2025Article
- The role of structural connectivity on brain function through a Markov model of signal transmission.PloS one · 2025Article
- State-transition dynamics of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data: model comparison and test-to-retest analysis.BMC neuroscience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Energy landscape analysis is a data-driven method to analyse multidimensional time series, including functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. It has been shown to be a useful characterization of fMRI data in health and disease. It fits an Ising model to the data and captures the dynamics of the data as movement of a noisy ball constrained on the energy landscape derived from the estimated Ising model. In the present study, we examine test-retest reliability of the energy landscape analysis. To this end, we construct a permutation test that assesses whether or not indices characterizing the energy landscape are more consistent across different sets of scanning sessions from the same participant (i.e. within-participant reliability) than across different sets of sessions from different participants (i.e. between-participant reliability). We show that the energy landscape analysis has significantly higher within-participant than between-participant test-retest reliability with respect to four commonly used indices. We also show that a variational Bayesian method, which enables us to estimate energy landscapes tailored to each participant, displays comparable test-retest reliability to that using the conventional likelihood maximization method. The proposed methodology paves the way to perform individual-level energy landscape analysis for given data sets with a statistically controlled reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38837814What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.