ArticleAndrology2025
Preconceptional paternal obesity may increase the risk of congenital urogenital anomalies in offspring: A case-control study.
Article in Andrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Obesity in reproduction: Mechanisms from fertilization to post‑uterine development (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2025Review
- Beyond Genes: Mechanistic and Epidemiological Insights into Paternal Environmental Influence on Offspring Health.Current environmental health reports · 2025Review
- Iron biomarkers in men with infertility are associated with sperm DNA hydroxymethylation and cumulative live birth rates: a prospective study.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Preconceptional paternal obesity may increase the risk of congenital urogenital anomalies in offspring: A case-control study.Andrology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCongenital urogenital anomalies affect 4-60 per 10,000 births. Maternal obesity, along with other risk factors, is well documented as a contributing factor. However, the impact of paternal obesity on risk is unclear. Obesity is prevalent among men of reproductive age, highlighting the need for further research into the potential association between paternal obesity and offspring congenital urogenital anomalies.
objectivesThis study aims to determine the association between paternal obesity and the risk of congenital urogenital malformations in offspring.
methodsCase-control study conducted on 179 newborns (91 cases, 88 controls) selected from the Notre Dame des Secours-university hospital database. Cases were identified as newborns presenting at least one congenital urogenital abnormality, defined as developmental anomalies that can result in a variety of malformations affecting the kidneys, ureters, bladder, and urethra. Controls were identified as newborns without any congenital abnormalities. The exclusion criteria were maternal obesity, infections during pregnancy, chronic diseases, prematurity, growth retardation, assisted reproductive technologies for conception, substance abuse, down syndrome, and other malformations. Data were collected through phone interviews, medical records, and questionnaires. In this study, the exposure was the preconceptional paternal body mass index (BMI), which was calculated based on self-reported height and weight. According to guidelines from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), individuals are considered to be in the healthy weight range if their BMI (kg/m
resultsSignificant differences in median (minimum-maximum) paternal BMI values were noted between the cases and controls at the time of conception (cases: 27.7 (43-20.1), controls: 24.8 (40.7-19.6); p < 0.0001). Logistic regression analysis confirmed that at the time of conception, compared to normal-weight fathers, overweight fathers displayed a heightened risk of offspring congenital malformations, with an odds ratio (OR) of 4.44 (95% CI = 2.1-9.1). Similarly, fathers categorized as obese Class I at conception had approximately eight times higher odds (OR = 8.62, 95% CI = 2.91-25.52) of having offspring with urogenital conditions compared to normal-weight fathers. Additionally, fathers classified as obese Class II at conception exhibited 5.75 times higher odds (OR = 5.75, 95% CI = 0.96-34.44) of having offspring with urogenital conditions in comparison to normal-weight fathers. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionWe found that the risk of urogenital malformations increased with paternal BMI during the preconceptional period. The findings suggest the importance of addressing paternal obesity in efforts to reduce the risk of urogenital congenital malformations in offspring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.