Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38837558›Full record

Observational studyNursing open2024

Risk factor evaluation of cuff pressure of >30 cmH

Hong-Lei Wu, Yue-Hong Wu, Wang-Qin Shen, Jia-Hai Shi, Yan-Ping Zhu, Yang-Hui Xu, Hong-Wu Shen, Lei Ding

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Nursing open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hong-Lei WuNursing Department, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Yue-Hong WuCollege of Nursing, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Wang-Qin ShenNursing Department, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Jia-Hai ShiDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8635-5376
Yan-Ping ZhuIntensive Care Unit of Southeast University Affiliated Zhong da Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Yang-Hui XuNursing Department, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Hong-Wu ShenNursing Department, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Lei DingIntensive Care Unit of Nantong Third People's Hospital, Affiliated Nantong Hospital 3 of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7041-8187

Funding

Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu SJCX21_1479Scientific Research Fund of Health Commission in Nantong City 2021006Scientific Research Fund of Health Commission in Nantong City MS2023072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe commonly recommended endotracheal tube cuff pressure is 20-30 cmH

designA multi-centre prospective observational study.

methodsEligible patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit of three hospitals between March 2020 and July 2022 were included. The endotracheal tube cuff pressure to prevent air leakage was determined using the minimal occlusive volume technique. The patient demographics and clinical information were collected.

resultsA total of 284 patients were included. Among these patients, 55 (19.37%) patients required a cuff pressure of >30 cmH

Indexed as

Intubation, IntratrachealRespiration, ArtificialAgedFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPressureProspective StudiesRisk Factorsair leakagecuff diametercuff pressureendotracheal intubationintensive care unitmechanical ventilationnursing

Identifiers

PMID38837558
PMCPMC11150861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.