ReviewJournal of inherited metabolic disease2024
Quo vadis ureagenesis disorders? A journey from 90 years ago into the future.
Review in Journal of inherited metabolic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Distinct Urea Cycle Dysfunction Profiles Differentiate Acute Metabolic Decompensation in TMEM70 and MT-ATP6-Related Mitochondrial ATP Synthase Defects.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2026Article
- Recurrent Hyperammonemic Encephalopathy in Adults with Citrin Deficiency: A Case Report of Two Genetically Confirmed Cases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Global research dynamics in urea cycle disorders: a bibliometric study highlighting key players and future directions.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Quo vadis ureagenesis disorders? A journey from 90 years ago into the future.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The pathway of ammonia disposal in the mammalian organism has been described in 1932 as a metabolic cycle present in the liver in different compartments. In 1958, the first human disorder affecting this pathway was described as a genetic condition leading to cognitive impairment and constant abnormalities of amino acid metabolism. Since then, defects in all enzymes and transporters of the urea cycle have been described, referring to them as primary urea cycle disorders causing primary hyperammonemia. In addition, there is a still increasing list of conditions that impact on the function of the urea cycle by various mechanisms, hereby leading to secondary hyperammonemia. Despite great advances in understanding the molecular background and the biochemical specificities of both primary and secondary hyperammonemias, there remain many open questions: we do not fully understand the pathophysiology in many of the conditions; we do not always understand the highly variable clinical course of affected patients; we clearly appreciate the need for novel and improved diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. This study does look back to the beginning of the urea cycle (hi)story, briefly describes the journey through past decades, hereby illustrating advancements and knowledge gaps, and gives examples for the extremely broad perspective imminent to some of the defects of ureagenesis and allied conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.