Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38837169›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2024

What does visual snow look like? Quantification by matching a simulation.

Samantha A Montoya, Carter B Mulder, Karly D Allison, Michael S Lee, Stephen A Engel, Michael-Paul Schallmo

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06961864 (Visual Perception in Visual Snow Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06961864 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Visual Perception in Visual Snow Syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MinnesotaRan2025 to 2030Enrolled100ConditionsVisual Snow Syndrome, Migraine, HealthyArmsVisual Adaptation, Assessments and Questionnaires, Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Visual Snow Is Susceptible to the Motion Aftereffect.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Adapting to Visual Noise Alleviates Visual Snow.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Samantha A MontoyaGraduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Carter B MulderDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Karly D AllisonDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Michael S LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Neurosciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Stephen A EngelDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Michael-Paul SchallmoDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Funding

A Longitudinal Mentoring Approach to Increase Diversity-RenewalR25NS117356 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Angeline Joan Dukes, Paul G Mermelstein · 2020 to 2026
$1.6M
Training Program in Translational Vision SciencesT32EY025187 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Glenn P Lobo, LINDA K. MCLOON · 2016 to 2026
$1.2M
Visual Perception in Visual Snow SyndromeF31EY034016 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI MONTOYA, SAMANTHA A · 2022 to 2025
$103k
NEI NIH HHS F31 EY034016NEI NIH HHS T32 EY025187NINDS NIH HHS R25 NS117356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primary symptom of visual snow syndrome (VSS) is the unremitting perception of small, flickering dots covering the visual field. VSS is a serious but poorly understood condition that can interfere with daily tasks. Several studies have provided qualitative data about the appearance of visual snow, but methods to quantify the symptom are lacking. Here, we developed a task in which participants with VSS adjusted parameters of simulated visual snow on a computer monitor until the simulation matched their internal visual snow. On each trial, participants (n = 31 with VSS) modified the size, density, update speed, and contrast of the simulation. Participants' settings were highly reliable across trials (intraclass correlation coefficients > 0.89), and they reported that the task was effective at stimulating their visual snow. On average, visual snow was very small (less than 2 arcmin in diameter), updated quickly (mean temporal frequency = 18.2 Hz), had low density (mean snow elements vs. background = 2.87%), and had low contrast (average root mean square contrast = 2.56%). Our task provided a quantitative assessment of visual snow percepts, which may help individuals with VSS communicate their experience to others, facilitate assessment of treatment efficacy, and further our understanding of the trajectory of symptoms, as well as the neural origins of VSS.

Indexed as

Visual FieldsAdultComputer SimulationContrast SensitivityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerceptual DisordersPhotic StimulationVision DisordersVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38837169
PMCPMC11160957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.