Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38837156›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

Genetic Testing for Global Developmental Delay in Early Childhood.

Jiamei Zhang, Yiran Xu, Yun Liu, Ling Yue, Hongfang Jin, Yongqian Chen, Dong Wang, Mingmei Wang, Gongxun Chen, Lei Yang and 11 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Translational pediatrics · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Jiamei ZhangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yiran XuHenan Key Laboratory of Child Brain Injury and Henan Pediatric Clinical Research Center, Institute of Neuroscience and Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yun LiuKunming Children's Hospital, Kunming, China.
Ling YueDepartment of Neurological Rehabilitation, Children's Hospital of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang, China.
Hongfang JinQinghai Provincial Women and Children's Hospital, Xining, China.
Yongqian ChenLanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
Dong WangDepartment of Pediatric Neurology, Xi'an Children's Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Mingmei WangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Gongxun ChenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Lei YangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Guangyu ZhangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Xiaoli ZhangDepartment of Pediatric Neurology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Sansong LiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Huiling ZhaoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yunxia ZhaoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Guohui NiuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yongqiang GaoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Zhijun CaiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Fan YangCipher Gene LLC, Beijing, China.
Changlian ZhuHenan Key Laboratory of Child Brain Injury and Henan Pediatric Clinical Research Center, Institute of Neuroscience and Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Dengna ZhuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Global developmental delay (GDD) is characterized by a complex etiology, diverse phenotypes, and high individual heterogeneity, presenting challenges for early clinical etiologic diagnosis. Cognitive impairment is the core symptom, and despite the pivotal role of genetic factors in GDD development, the understanding of them remains limited. Objectives: To assess the utility of genetic detection in patients with GDD and to examine the potential molecular pathogenesis of GDD to identify targets for early intervention. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, prospective cohort study enrolled patients aged 12 to 60 months with GDD from 6 centers in China from July 4, 2020, to August 31, 2023. Participants underwent trio whole exome sequencing (trio-WES) coupled with copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq). Bioinformatics analysis was used to unravel pathogenesis and identify therapeutic targets. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes of this study involved enhancing the rate of positive genetic diagnosis for GDD, broadening the scope of genetic testing indications, and investigating the underlying pathogenesis. The classification of children into levels of cognitive impairment was based on the developmental quotient assessed using the Gesell scale. Results: The study encompassed 434 patients with GDD (262 [60%] male; mean [SD] age, 25.75 [13.24] months) with diverse degrees of cognitive impairment: mild (98 [23%]), moderate (141 [32%]), severe (122 [28%]), and profound (73 [17%]). The combined use of trio-WES and CNV-seq resulted in a 61% positive detection rate. Craniofacial abnormalities (odds ratio [OR], 2.27; 95% CI, 1.45-3.56), moderate or severe cognitive impairment (OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.05-2.70), and age between 12 and 24 months (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.05-2.35) were associated with a higher risk of carrying genetic variants. Additionally, bioinformatics analysis suggested that genetic variants may induce alterations in brain development and function, which may give rise to cognitive impairment. Moreover, an association was found between the dopaminergic pathway and cognitive impairment. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients with GDD, combining trio-WES with CNV-seq was a demonstrable, instrumental strategy for advancing the diagnosis of GDD. The close association among genetic variations, brain development, and clinical phenotypes contributed valuable insights into the pathogenesis of GDD. Notably, the dopaminergic pathway emerged as a promising focal point for potential targets in future precision medical interventions for GDD.

Indexed as

Developmental DisabilitiesGenetic TestingChild, PreschoolChinaCognitive DysfunctionDNA Copy Number VariationsExome SequencingFemaleHumansInfantMaleProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38837156
PMCPMC11154162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.