Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38837145›Full record

ArticleJAMA surgery2024

Large Language Model Capabilities in Perioperative Risk Prediction and Prognostication.

Philip Chung, Christine T Fong, Andrew M Walters, Nima Aghaeepour, Meliha Yetisgen, Vikas N O'Reilly-Shah

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07696221 (Comparison of Clinical Assessment and Large Language Models in Preoperative Risk Classification), which is not on this map. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07696221 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Clinical Assessment and Large Language Models in Preoperative Risk Classification: A Retrospective Analysis of ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Gemini, and Claude in ASA Physical Status Classification

TypeobservationalSponsorMarmara University Pendik Training and Research HospitalRan2026 to 2026Enrolled350ConditionsAnesthesia, Preoperative Risk Prediction, Preoperative Risk Assessment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. GIVersa-Endoscopy: A Large Language Model-Based Artificial Intelligence Assistant for Endoscopy Sedation Triage.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Philip ChungDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Christine T FongDepartment of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.
Andrew M WaltersDepartment of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.
Nima AghaeepourDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Meliha YetisgenDepartment of Biomedical & Health Informatics, University of Washington, Seattle.
Vikas N O'Reilly-ShahDepartment of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.

Funding

Research in Anesthesia Training Program (ReAP)T32GM089626 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Vivianne L Tawfik · 2010 to 2026
$5.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM089626
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: General-domain large language models may be able to perform risk stratification and predict postoperative outcome measures using a description of the procedure and a patient's electronic health record notes. Objective: To examine predictive performance on 8 different tasks: prediction of American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS), hospital admission, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, unplanned admission, hospital mortality, postanesthesia care unit (PACU) phase 1 duration, hospital duration, and ICU duration. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prognostic study included task-specific datasets constructed from 2 years of retrospective electronic health records data collected during routine clinical care. Case and note data were formatted into prompts and given to the large language model GPT-4 Turbo (OpenAI) to generate a prediction and explanation. The setting included a quaternary care center comprising 3 academic hospitals and affiliated clinics in a single metropolitan area. Patients who had a surgery or procedure with anesthesia and at least 1 clinician-written note filed in the electronic health record before surgery were included in the study. Data were analyzed from November to December 2023. Exposures: Compared original notes, note summaries, few-shot prompting, and chain-of-thought prompting strategies. Main Outcomes and Measures: F1 score for binary and categorical outcomes. Mean absolute error for numerical duration outcomes. Results: Study results were measured on task-specific datasets, each with 1000 cases with the exception of unplanned admission, which had 949 cases, and hospital mortality, which had 576 cases. The best results for each task included an F1 score of 0.50 (95% CI, 0.47-0.53) for ASA-PS, 0.64 (95% CI, 0.61-0.67) for hospital admission, 0.81 (95% CI, 0.78-0.83) for ICU admission, 0.61 (95% CI, 0.58-0.64) for unplanned admission, and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.83-0.89) for hospital mortality prediction. Performance on duration prediction tasks was universally poor across all prompt strategies for which the large language model achieved a mean absolute error of 49 minutes (95% CI, 46-51 minutes) for PACU phase 1 duration, 4.5 days (95% CI, 4.2-5.0 days) for hospital duration, and 1.1 days (95% CI, 0.9-1.3 days) for ICU duration prediction. Conclusions and Relevance: Current general-domain large language models may assist clinicians in perioperative risk stratification on classification tasks but are inadequate for numerical duration predictions. Their ability to produce high-quality natural language explanations for the predictions may make them useful tools in clinical workflows and may be complementary to traditional risk prediction models.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsAgedFemaleHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID38837145
PMCPMC11154375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.