Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38837004›Full record

ArticleJournal of nephrology2024

First experiences with machine learning predictions of accelerated declining eGFR slope of living kidney donors 3 years after donation.

Leandra Lukomski, Juan Pisula, Tristan Wagner, Andrii Sabov, Nils Große Hokamp, Katarzyna Bozek, Felix Popp, Martin Kann, Christine Kurschat, Jan Ulrich Becker and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nephrology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Leandra LukomskiDepartment of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplant Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany. leandra.lukomski@uk-koeln.de.ORCID 0000-0002-6998-2255
Juan PisulaData Science of Bioimages Lab, Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Robert-Koch-Straße 21, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Tristan WagnerDepartment of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplant Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Andrii SabovInstitute for Diagnostics and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Nils Große HokampInstitute for Diagnostics and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Katarzyna BozekData Science of Bioimages Lab, Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Robert-Koch-Straße 21, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Felix PoppDepartment of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplant Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Martin KannDepartment II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Christine KurschatDepartment II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Jan Ulrich BeckerInstitute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Christiane BrunsDepartment of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplant Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Michael ThomasDepartment of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplant Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Dirk StippelDepartment of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplant Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLiving kidney donors are screened pre-donation to estimate the risk of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). We evaluate Machine Learning (ML) to predict the progression of kidney function deterioration over time using the estimated GFR (eGFR) slope as the target variable.

methodsWe included 238 living kidney donors who underwent donor nephrectomy. We divided the dataset based on the eGFR slope in the third follow-up year, resulting in 185 donors with an average eGFR slope and 53 donors with an accelerated declining eGFR-slope. We trained three Machine Learning-models (Random Forest [RF], Extreme Gradient Boosting [XG], Support Vector Machine [SVM]) and Logistic Regression (LR) for predictions. Predefined data subsets served for training to explore whether parameters of an ESKD risk score alone suffice or additional clinical and time-zero biopsy parameters enhance predictions. Machine learning-driven feature selection identified the best predictive parameters.

resultsNone of the four models classified the eGFR slope with an AUC greater than 0.6 or an F1 score surpassing 0.41 despite training on different data subsets. Following machine learning-driven feature selection and subsequent retraining on these selected features, random forest and extreme gradient boosting outperformed other models, achieving an AUC of 0.66 and an F1 score of 0.44. After feature selection, two predictive donor attributes consistently appeared in all models: smoking-related features and glomerulitis of the Banff Lesion Score.

conclusionsTraining machine learning-models with distinct predefined data subsets yielded unsatisfactory results. However, the efficacy of random forest and extreme gradient boosting improved when trained exclusively with machine learning-driven selected features, suggesting that the quality, rather than the quantity, of features is crucial for machine learning-model performance. This study offers insights into the application of emerging machine learning-techniques for the screening of living kidney donors.

Indexed as

Glomerular Filtration RateKidney Failure, ChronicKidney TransplantationLiving DonorsMachine LearningNephrectomyAdultDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansKidneyMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorseGFR slopeLiving kidney donorsLiving kidney transplantationMachine learning in transplantation

Identifiers

PMID38837004
PMCPMC11473598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.