Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38836953›Full record

ReviewTargeted oncology2024

Targeted Alpha Therapy for Glioblastoma: Review on In Vitro, In Vivo and Clinical Trials.

Maram El Sabri, Leyla Moghaddasi, Puthenparampil Wilson, Frank Saran, Eva Bezak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Targeted oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. LAT1-Targeted Alpha Therapy UsingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maram El SabriAllied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, University of South Australia City East Campus, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia. maram.el_sabri@mymail.unisa.edu.au.ORCID 0009-0006-2958-5972
Leyla MoghaddasiDepartment of Medical Physics, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, 2065, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6127-912X
Puthenparampil WilsonUniSA STEM, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0448-7691
Frank SaranAllied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, University of South Australia City East Campus, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3448-5064
Eva BezakAllied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, University of South Australia City East Campus, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1315-1735

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GB), a prevalent and highly malignant primary brain tumour with a very high mortality rate due to its resistance to conventional therapies and invasive nature, resulting in 5-year survival rates of only 4-17%. Despite recent advancements in cancer management, the survival rates for GB patients have not significantly improved over the last 10-20 years. Consequently, there exists a critical unmet need for innovative therapies. One promising approach for GB is Targeted Alpha Therapy (TAT), which aims to selectively deliver potentially therapeutic radiation doses to malignant cells and the tumour microenvironment while minimising radiation exposure to surrounding normal tissue with or without conventional external beam radiation. This approach has shown promise in both pre-clinical and clinical settings. A review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines across Medline, SCOPUS, and Embase, identifying 34 relevant studies out of 526 initially found. In pre-clinical studies, TAT demonstrated high binding specificity to targeted GB cells, with affinity rates between 60.0% and 84.2%, and minimal binding to non-targeted cells (4.0-5.6%). This specificity significantly enhanced cytotoxic effects and improved biodistribution when delivered intratumorally. Mice treated with TAT showed markedly higher median survival rates compared to control groups. In clinical trials, TAT applied to recurrent GB (rGB) displayed varying success rates in extending overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival. Particularly effective when integrated into treatment regimens for both newly diagnosed and recurrent cases, TAT increased the median OS by 16.1% in newly diagnosed GB and by 36.4% in rGB, compared to current standard therapies. Furthermore, it was generally well tolerated with minimal adverse effects. These findings underscore the potential of TAT as a viable therapeutic option in the management of GB.

Indexed as

Alpha ParticlesClinical Trials as TopicGlioblastomaAnimalsBrain NeoplasmsHumansMice

Identifiers

PMID38836953
PMCPMC11230998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.