Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38836929›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2024

Correlation of RANK and RANKL with mammographic density in primary breast cancer patients.

Marius Wunderle, Felix Heindl, Annika S Behrens, Lothar Häberle, Carolin C Hack, Katharina Heusinger, Hanna Huebner, Paul Gass, Matthias Ruebner, Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Marius WunderleDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0009-0007-7280-7697
Felix HeindlDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Annika S BehrensDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Lothar HäberleDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Carolin C HackDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Katharina HeusingerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Hanna HuebnerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Paul GassDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Matthias RuebnerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Rüdiger Schulz-WendtlandBavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Erlangen, Germany.
Ramona ErberBavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Erlangen, Germany.
Arndt HartmannBavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Erlangen, Germany.
Matthias W BeckmannDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
William C DougallImmunology in Cancer and Infection Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, 4702, Australia.
Michael F PressDepartment of Pathology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.
Peter A FaschingDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany. peter.fasching@fau.de.ORCID 0000-0003-4885-8471
Julius EmonsDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany.

Funding

Breast Cancer Research Foundation BCRF-22-132California Breast Cancer Research Program BCRP 12IB-0155
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B (RANK) and its ligand (RANKL) have been shown to promote proliferation of the breast and breast carcinogenesis. The objective of this analysis was to investigate whether tumor-specific RANK and RANKL expression in patients with primary breast cancer is associated with high percentage mammographic density (PMD), which is a known breast cancer risk factor.

methodsImmunohistochemical staining of RANK and RANKL was performed in tissue microarrays (TMAs) from primary breast cancer samples of the Bavarian Breast Cancer Cases and Controls (BBCC) study. For RANK and RANKL expression, histochemical scores (H scores) with a cut-off value of > 0 vs 0 were established. PMD was measured in the contralateral, non-diseased breast. Linear regression models with PMD as outcome were calculated using common predictors of PMD (age at breast cancer diagnosis, body mass index (BMI) and parity) and RANK and RANKL H scores. Additionally, Spearman rank correlations (ρ) between PMD and RANK and RANKL H score were performed.

resultsIn the final cohort of 412 patients, breast cancer-specific RANK and RANKL expression was not associated with PMD (P = 0.68). There was no correlation between PMD and RANK H score (Spearman's ρ = 0.01, P = 0.87) or RANKL H score (Spearman's ρ = 0.04, P = 0.41). RANK expression was highest in triple-negative tumors, followed by HER2-positive, luminal B-like and luminal A-like tumors, while no subtype-specific expression of RANKL was found.

conclusionResults do not provide evidence for an association of RANK and RANKL expression in primary breast cancer with PMD.

Indexed as

Breast DensityBreast NeoplasmsRANK LigandReceptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-kappa BAdultAgedBreastCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMiddle AgedTissue Array AnalysisRANK LigandReceptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-kappa BTNFRSF11A protein, humanTNFSF11 protein, humanBreast cancerImmunohistochemistryMammographic densityRANK expressionRANKL expression

Identifiers

PMID38836929
PMCPMC11258178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.