Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38836928›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2024

Patient care and access to clinical trials in gynaecological oncology: global implications of the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Sara Nasser, Christina Fotopoulou, Murat Gültekin, Desislava Dimitrova, Esra Bilir, Gülhan Inci, Philippe Morice, Mansoor Raza Mirza, Antonio Gonzalez Martin, Jonathan Berek and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sara NasserDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Charite Campus Virchow Klinikum, Augustenburgerplatz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany. sara.nasser@charite.de.ORCID 0000-0002-5719-7532
Christina FotopoulouDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Charite Campus Virchow Klinikum, Augustenburgerplatz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6375-9645
Murat GültekinDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hacettepe University Hospitals, Ankara, Turkey.
Desislava DimitrovaDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Charite Campus Virchow Klinikum, Augustenburgerplatz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Esra BilirDepartment of Global Health, Koç University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-4499-6543
Gülhan InciDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Charite Campus Virchow Klinikum, Augustenburgerplatz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Philippe MoriceInstitute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Mansoor Raza MirzaDepartment of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Antonio Gonzalez MartinClinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8376-9576
Jonathan BerekStanford Women´S Cancer Center, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Jalid SehouliDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Charite Campus Virchow Klinikum, Augustenburgerplatz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5963-6623
Collaborating Groups: European Network for Gynaecological Oncology Trials (ENGOT), European Society for Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), Gynecological Cancer Intergroup (GCIG), Pan-Arabian Research Society for Gynecological Oncology (PARSGO), North-East German Gynecological Oncology Society (NOGGO)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOur prospective international survey evaluated the impact of the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic on the management gynaecological malignancies from the multidisciplinary physicians' perspective with particular focus on clinical infrastructures and trial participation.

methodsOur survey consisted of 53 COVID-related questions. It was sent to healthcare professionals in gynaecological oncology centres across Europe and Pan-Arabian region via the study groups and gynaecological societies from April 2020 to October 2020. All healthcare professionals treating gynaecological cancers were able to participate in our survey.

resultsA total of 255 answers were collected from 30 countries. The majority (73%) of participants were gynaecological oncologists from university hospitals (71%) with at least an Intensive Care Unit with cardiopulmonary support available at their institutions. Most institutions continued to perform elective surgeries only for oncological cases (98%). Patients had to wait on average 2 weeks longer for their surgery appointments compared to previous years (range 0-12 weeks). Most cases that were prioritised for surgical intervention across all gynaecological tumours were early-stage disease (74%), primary situation (61%) and good ECOG status (63%). The radicality of surgery did not change in the majority of cases (78%) across all tumour types. During the pandemic, only 38% of clinicians stated they would start a new clinical trial. Almost half of the participants stated the pandemic negatively impacted the financial structure and support for clinical trials. Approximately 20% of clinicians did not feel well-informed regarding clinical algorithm for COVID-19 patients throughout the pandemic. Thirty percent stated that they are currently having trouble in providing adequate medical care due to staff shortage.

conclusionDespite well-established guidelines, pandemic clearly affected clinical research and patientcare. Our survey underlines the necessity for building robust emergency algorithms tailored to gynaecological oncology to minimise negative impact in crises and to preserve access to clinical trials.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicCOVID-19Genital Neoplasms, FemaleFemaleGynecologyHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMedical OncologyPandemicsPatient CareProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesClinical trialsCOVID-19Gynaecologic oncologyHealthcare disparitiesPandemic

Identifiers

PMID38836928
PMCPMC11168972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.