Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38836843›Full record

ArticleMilitary medicine2024

A Scoping Review of Military Culture, Military Identity, and Mental Health Outcomes in Military Personnel.

Carolyn Heward, Wendy Li, Ylona Chun Tie, Pippa Waterworth

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Military medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Veterans' Experiences with a Social Need Intervention.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Creative ForcesFrontiers in psychiatry · 2026
    Review
  13. The Association of Stigma and Alcohol Treatment Interest Among Women Veterans.Translational issues in psychological science · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Steeping in how "shut up and color" mindset manifests: Semantic analysis of open-ended responses for barriers to support seeking among veterans.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carolyn HewardJames Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8443-1446
Wendy LiJames Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0056-6130
Ylona Chun TieJames Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6069-8074
Pippa WaterworthIndependent Researcher.ORCID 0000-0001-7180-2906

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe military is a unique cultural institution that significantly influences its members, contributing to the development and transformation of their identities. Despite growing interest in identity research in the military, challenges persist in the conceptualization of military identity, including understanding how it forms, assessing the influence of military culture on identity development, and evaluating the implications for mental health. The primary objective of this scoping review was to map the complexities of military culture's impact on military identity and its effects on mental health. MATERIALS AND

methodsA scoping review of the literature was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute Scoping Review Methodology. Studies were included if they described military culture, military identity, and mental health, resulting in 65 eligible studies. The extracted data were thematically analyzed to identify how military culture impacts military identity and mental health and well-being.

resultsMultiple identities were evident within the military population, with 2 overarching identities, loyalty and military, overall conferring positive mental health outcomes. Where these identities were hidden or disrupted, poorer mental health outcomes were observed.

conclusionsThe scoping review conducted in this study challenges the notion of military identity as a singular concept promoting positive mental health outcomes. It highlights its multifaceted nature, revealing that individuals may face identity concealment and disruptions during periods of transition or adjustment, resulting in adverse mental health outcomes. To capture the complexity of military identity, the authors developed the Military Identity Model (MIM). Military leaders, policymakers, and health care professionals are encouraged to recognize the complex nature of military identity and its impact on mental health and well-being. We recommend using the Military Identity Model to explore military identity and adjustment-related difficulties.

Indexed as

Mental HealthMilitary PersonnelHumansSocial Identification

Identifiers

PMID38836843
PMCPMC11536329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.