ArticleProtein engineering, design & selection : PEDS2024
Sequence-developability mapping of affibody and fibronectin paratopes via library-scale variant characterization.
Article in Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applying Computational Protein Design to Engineer Affibodies for Affinity-controlled Delivery of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Platelet-Derived Growth Factor.Biomacromolecules · 2025Article
- Engineering Affibody Binders to Death Receptor 5 and Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor 1 With Improved Stability.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protein developability is requisite for use in therapeutic, diagnostic, or industrial applications. Many developability assays are low throughput, which limits their utility to the later stages of protein discovery and evolution. Recent approaches enable experimental or computational assessment of many more variants, yet the breadth of applicability across protein families and developability metrics is uncertain. Here, three library-scale assays-on-yeast protease, split green fluorescent protein (GFP), and non-specific binding-were evaluated for their ability to predict two key developability outcomes (thermal stability and recombinant expression) for the small protein scaffolds affibody and fibronectin. The assays' predictive capabilities were assessed via both linear correlation and machine learning models trained on the library-scale assay data. The on-yeast protease assay is highly predictive of thermal stability for both scaffolds, and the split-GFP assay is informative of affibody thermal stability and expression. The library-scale data was used to map sequence-developability landscapes for affibody and fibronectin binding paratopes, which guides future design of variants and libraries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.