Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38836371›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2025

Coin-cidence? Have cashless payments reduced the incidence of upper aerodigestive foreign body insertion? A study of UK Hospital Episode Statistics.

A Jangan, E Watts, M Pankhania

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A JanganWalsall Healthcare NHS Trust, UK.
E WattsUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
M PankhaniaThe Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesInsertions of nasal and oral foreign bodies (FB) are common presentations in the emergency department, with coins frequently implicated among paediatric populations. Contactless payments were first introduced in the UK in 2007, and cash payments significantly declined from 2012. This study aims to explore the potential implications of increasing contactless payments on FB ingestion.

methodsUK Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) were reviewed between 2000 and 2022. All FB retrieval procedures involving the alimentary tract, respiratory tract and nasal cavity were included. Regression analysis was performed to assess trends in the incidence of FB ingestion before and following the transition to cashless payments in 2012.

resultsFollowing the decline in cash payments in 2012, the frequency of alimentary tract FB removal procedures decreased significantly by 27.78 procedures per year (

conclusionsThis study suggests a statistically significant decline in the number of procedures for removal of FB performed in the UK from 2012. Although this relationship is multifactorial, our data suggest an association between the introduction of contactless payments and a reduction in the number of FB retrieval procedures from the of upper aerodigestive tract.

Indexed as

Foreign BodiesChildChild, PreschoolEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansIncidenceInfantMaleNasal CavityUnited KingdomCashless paymentsCoin foreign bodyContactless paymentsHospital Episode StatisticsUpper aerodigestive tract foreign body

Identifiers

PMID38836371
PMCPMC11785444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.