ArticlePhysical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP2024
Coupled-cluster treatment of complex open-shell systems: the case of single-molecule magnets.
Article in Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quantum-embedded equation-of-motion coupled-cluster approach to single-atom magnets on surfaces.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigate the reliability of two cost-effective coupled-cluster methods for computing spin-state energetics and spin-related properties of a set of open-shell transition-metal complexes. Specifically, we employ the second-order approximate coupled-cluster singles and doubles (CC2) method and projection-based embedding that combines equation-of-motion coupled-cluster singles and doubles (EOM-CCSD) with density functional theory (DFT). The performance of CC2 and EOM-CCSD-in-DFT is assessed against EOM-CCSD. The chosen test set includes two hexaaqua transition-metal complexes containing Fe(II) and Fe(III), and a large Co(II)-based single-molecule magnet with a non-aufbau ground state. We find that CC2 describes the excited states more accurately, reproducing EOM-CCSD excitation energies within 0.05 eV. However, EOM-CCSD-in-DFT excels in describing transition orbital angular momenta and spin-orbit couplings. Moreover, for the Co(II) molecular magnet, using EOM-CCSD-in-DFT eigenstates and spin-orbit couplings, we compute spin-reversal energy barriers, as well as temperature-dependent and field-dependent magnetizations and magnetic susceptibilities that closely match experimental values within spectroscopic accuracy. These results underscore the efficiency of CC2 in computing state energies of multi-configurational, open-shell systems and highlight the utility of the more cost-efficient EOM-CCSD-in-DFT for computing spin-orbit couplings and magnetic properties of complex and large molecular magnets.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.