Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38836275›Full record

ArticleJournal of stroke2024

Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase in Medium Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Stroke: A Secondary Analysis of the Alteplase Compared to Tenecteplase Randomized Trial.

Fouzi Bala, Nishita Singh, Katrina Ignacio, Ibrahim Alhabli, Ayoola Ademola, Anas Alrohimi, Houman Khosravani, Aleksander Tkach, Luciana Catanese, Dariush Dowlatshahi and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of stroke, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Fouzi BalaDiagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology Department, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France.
Nishita SinghDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Katrina IgnacioDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Ibrahim AlhabliDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Ayoola AdemolaDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Anas AlrohimiDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Houman KhosravaniSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Aleksander TkachKelowna General Hospital, Kelowna, Canada.
Luciana CataneseHamilton Health Sciences Centre and McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Dariush DowlatshahiDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, and the Ottawa Heart Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Thalia FieldVancouver Stroke Program and the Division of Neurology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Gary HunterUniversity of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Faysal BenaliDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre+ (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
MacKenzie HornDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Andrew DemchukDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Michael HillDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Tolulope SajobiDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Brian BuckDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Richard SwartzDepartment of Medicine (Neurology), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed AlmekhlafiDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Bijoy K MenonDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe safety and efficacy of tenecteplase in patients with ischemic stroke due to medium vessel occlusion (MeVO) are not well studied. We aimed to compare tenecteplase with alteplase in stroke due to MeVO.

methodsPatients with baseline M2-middle cerebral artery (MCA), M3/M4-MCA, P2/P3/P4-posterior cerebral artery (PCA), A2/A3/A4-anterior cerebral artery (ACA) occlusions from the Alteplase Compared to Tenecteplase (AcT) trial were included. Primary outcome was the proportion of 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-1. Secondary outcomes were 90-day mRS 0-2, ordinal mRS, mortality, quality of life measures (EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level, EuroQol visual analog scale), and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH). Initial and final successful reperfusion were reported in patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT).

resultsAmong 1,558 patients with available baseline computed tomography angiography; 455 (29.2%) had MeVO of which 27.5% (125/455) were proximal M2; 16.3% (74/455) were distal M2; 35.2% (160/455) were M3/M4; 7.5% (34/455) were A2/A3/A4; and 13.6% (62/455) were P2/P3/P4 occlusions. EVT was performed in 87/455 (19.1%) patients. mRS 0-1 at 90 days was achieved in 37.9% in the tenecteplase versus 34.7% in the alteplase group (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91-1.25). Rates of 90-day mRS 0-2, sICH, and mortality were similar in both groups. No statistical difference was noted in initial successful reperfusion rates (13.0% vs. 7.5%) among the 87 patients who underwent endovascular thrombectomy. However, final successful reperfusion was higher in the tenecteplase group (71.7% vs. 60.0%, aRR 1.29, 95% CI 1.04-1.61).

conclusionIntravenous tenecteplase had comparable safety, functional outcomes and quality of life compared to intravenous alteplase among patients with MeVO. Among those treated with EVT, tenecteplase was associated with higher successful reperfusion rates than alteplase.

Indexed as

AlteplaseIschemicMechanical thrombectomyOcclusionStrokeThrombolysis

Identifiers

PMID38836275
PMCPMC11164589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.