Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38836269›Full record

ReviewJournal of stroke2024

Neuroprotective Approaches for Brain Injury After Cardiac Arrest: Current Trends and Prospective Avenues.

Subash Marasini, Xiaofeng Jia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of stroke, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Mechanism of post cardiac arrest syndrome based on animal models of cardiac arrest.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Subash MarasiniDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Xiaofeng JiaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

Improving Brain Recovery Through GlycoengineeringR01NS125232 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI Xiaofeng Jia · 2022 to 2026
$2.0M
Brain Monitoring and Therapeutic Hypothermia after Cardiac ArrestR01HL118084 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI JIA, XIAOFENG · 2013 to 2018
$1.9M
Brain Recovery after Cardiac Arrest with Metabolic Glycoengineered Stem CellsR01NS110387 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI JIA, XIAOFENG · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
Maryland Stem Cell Research Fund 2024-MSCRFD-6401NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL118084NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL118084NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS110387NINDS NIH HHS R01NS110387NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS125232NINDS NIH HHS R01NS125232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the implementation of improved bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation techniques and public-access defibrillation, survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has increased significantly over the years. Nevertheless, OHCA survivors have residual anoxia/reperfusion brain damage and associated neurological impairment resulting in poor quality of life. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or targeted temperature management has proven effective in improving post-cardiac arrest (CA) neurological outcomes, yet considering the substantial healthcare costs and resources involved, there is an urgent need for alternative treatment strategies that are crucial to alleviate brain injury and promote recovery of neurological function after CA. In this review, we searched PubMed for the latest preclinical or clinical studies (2016-2023) utilizing gas-mediated, pharmacological, or stem cell-based neuroprotective approaches after CA. Preclinical studies utilizing various gases (nitric oxide, hydrogen, hydrogen sulfide, carbon monoxide, argon, and xenon), pharmacological agents targeting specific CA-related pathophysiology, and stem cells have shown promising results in rodent and porcine models of CA. Although inhaled gases and several pharmacological agents have entered clinical trials, most have failed to demonstrate therapeutic effects in CA patients. To date, stem cell therapies have not been reported in clinical trials for CA. A relatively small number of preclinical stem-cell studies with subtle therapeutic benefits and unelucidated mechanistic explanations warrant the need for further preclinical studies including the improvement of their therapeutic potential. The current state of the field is discussed and the exciting potential of stem-cell therapy to abate neurological dysfunction following CA is highlighted.

Indexed as

Cardiac arrestGasesNeuroprotectionPharmacological approachStem cells

Identifiers

PMID38836269
PMCPMC11164592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.