Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38836217›Full record

ArticleSociete internationale d'urologie journal : SIUJ2022

2022 WUOF/SIU International Consultation on Urological Diseases: Active Surveillance for Small Renal Masses.

Eric C Kauffman, Mark W Ball, Ravi Barod, Umberto Capitanio, Antonio Finelli, M Carmen Mir, Brian Shuch, Marc C Smaldone, Maxine G B Tran, Phillip M Pierorazio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Societe internationale d'urologie journal : SIUJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Eric C KauffmanDepartment of Urology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, United States.
Mark W BallUrologic Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States.
Ravi BarodSpecialist Centre for Kidney Cancer, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Umberto CapitanioUnit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Antonio FinelliDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
M Carmen MirDepartment of Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano Oncologia, Valencia, Spain.
Brian ShuchDepartment of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States.
Marc C SmaldoneDivision of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, United States.
Maxine G B TranUniversity College London Division of Surgery and Interventional Science and The Specialist Centre for Kidney Cancer at the Royal Free London Hospital, United Kingdom.
Phillip M PierorazioDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, United States.

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With greater awareness of indolence underlying small renal masses (SRM ≤ 4 cm) and the morbidity of invasive treatment, active surveillance for SRM patients is being increasingly utilized on an international level. This synopsis summarizes the 2022 review and expert opinion recommendations provided to the International Consultation of Urological Diseases (ICUD) by 10 urologists from high-volume active surveillance practices at international centers. Topics reviewed include SRM biology and clinical behavior, current national and international guidelines for active surveillance of SRM patients, active surveillance utilization patterns and barriers to implementation, outcomes and limitations of the active surveillance literature, criteria for active surveillance patient selection, protocols for active surveillance management including frequency/modality of imaging and the role of renal tumor biopsy, triggers for delayed intervention during active surveillance including tumor factors and patient factors, and pathological outcomes of delayed intervention. We conclude that despite limitations of the current literature, active surveillance is a safe initial management strategy for many SRM patients. The slow growth and low metastatic potential of SRMs, combined with no evidence to suggest oncologic compromise with delay to treatment, should provide confidence to both patients and providers who are considering active surveillance. Future research for prioritization should include characterization of long-term active surveillance outcomes including rates of metastasis and delayed intervention, standardization of objective tumor progression criteria for triggering delayed intervention, and further delineation of the role for active surveillance in young and healthy patients.

Indexed as

active surveillancekidney cancermanagement strategiesSmall renal mass

Identifiers

PMID38836217
PMCPMC11149394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.