ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2024
Lifelike
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction in Ultra-High-Resolution CT Venography for Improved Visualization of Cerebral Venous Drainage.Clinical neuroradiology · 2026Article
- PixelPrint 4D : A 3D Printing Method of Fabricating Patient-Specific Deformable CT Phantoms for Respiratory Motion Applications.Investigative radiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning CT reconstruction (DLR) has become increasingly popular as a method for improving image quality and reducing radiation exposure. Due to their nonlinear nature, these algorithms result in resolution and noise performance which are object-dependent. Therefore, traditional CT phantoms, which lack realistic tissue morphology, have become inadequate for assessing clinical imaging performance. We propose to utilize 3D-printed PixelPrint phantoms, which exhibit lifelike attenuation profiles, textures, and structures, as a better tool for evaluating DLR performance. In this study, we evaluate a DLR algorithm (Precise Image (PI), Philips Healthcare) using a custom PixelPrint lung phantom and perform head-to-head comparisons between DLR, iterative reconstruction, and filtered back projection (FBP) with scans acquired at a broad range of radiation exposures (CTDI
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.