ReviewCureus2024
Gender Disparities in Cardiovascular Disease and Their Management: A Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Inclusion of sex and gender in clinical practice guidelines: an umbrella review.BMJ open quality · 2026Pooled it
- Sex-specific associations between potentially traumatic events and cardiovascular disease in middle-aged and older adults.Journal of traumatic stress · 2026Article
- Review
- Sex-based differences in myocardial perfusion imaging among diabetic Egyptian patients:a retrospective registry study.Global cardiology science & practice · 2026Article
- Review
- From protection to predisposition: A narrative review of sex-specific vascular responses to acute stressors across the lifespan.Physiological reports · 2026Review
- Epigenetic signatures of cardiometabolic risk in men: accelerated aging and differential methylation replicated across cohorts.Clinical epigenetics · 2026Article
- Ten-year trends in cardiovascular risk factors among patients hospitalised with acute myocardial infarction in Estonia: a retrospective nationwide observational study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Observational
- Sex-dependent differences in mitochondrial protein acetylation in metabolic condition, oxidative stress, vascular dysfunction, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease.Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2026Review
- Alzheimer's Disease Risk Factor APOE4 Exerts Dimorphic Effects on Female Bone.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of pathways induced by TMAO and TNF-α in human microvascular endothelial cells.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic CT versus clinical methods for sarcopenia screening.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
- Global trends and projections in cardiovascular disease-related heart failure, 1990-2050: an analysis of the Global Burden of Disease 2021 data.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Nationwide analysis of mortality predictors following in-hospital cardiac arrest in older Thai adults, 2016-2024.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Community based interventions for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women living in rural, regional and remote areas: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- A Single Concussion in Juvenile Mice Leads to Sex Specific Acute Cerebral Vascular Dysfunction and Blood-brain Border Dysfunction.Research square · 2026Article
- "I can't enjoy my full sex life": Understanding the sexual experiences of women with interstitial cystitis.Journal of health psychology · 2026Article
- Unveiling sex-specific cardiometabolic and adiposity risk profiles for precision prevention.European journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Hospitalisation for acute heart failure and in-hospital mortality before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic in France: a nationwide cohort study from 2013 to 2024.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Emerging roles of spexin in cardiovascular homeostasis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Worldwide, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are still the primary cause of death, and there are notable differences between sexes when it comes to symptoms/course and treatment. Due to evolving healthcare technologies, significant progress has been made in understanding CVDs. Hence, it is evident that gender disparities exist in the clinical presentation, prevalence, management, outcomes, and risk factors, including biological, behavioral, and sociocultural factors. This narrative review is designed to provide a generalized idea of gender disparities in CVDs. It aims to provide insights to prove the role of hormonal influences, genetic predispositions, and the difference in physiological outcomes owing to different genders. This review explores subtle distinctions in CVD across genders, including changes in structure, biology, and hormones that affect how illness presents and progresses. Lifestyle variables also influence sociocultural factors and gender disparities in risk profiles. Traditional risk factors, diabetes mellitus (DM), cholesterol levels, and smoking may have different weights and relevance in men and women. Moreover, age and other conventional risk variables have distinct effects on gender. Treatment efficacy may be impacted by the expression of gender-specific factors, emphasizing the necessity for customized strategies. Development of CVDs can be delayed or prevented, and its consequences can be lessened with the early identification and effective management of gender-specific factors. More investigation is necessary to clarify complex interactions between structural, biochemical, and hormonal aspects across genders in order to maximize treatment results and reduce the burden of CVDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.