ArticleMalariaWorld journal2011
Novel malaria control by strategic net-hoisting with S/O channel/grip devices.
Article in MalariaWorld journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mosquito control via inbuilt net hoisting windows: the inverted S/O channel/grip device option.MalariaWorld journal · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hoisting of netting screens with battens on windows/vents suffers from unsightly gathering of dust and allergens, which may provoke respiratory diseases and therefore lack popularity as a mosquito/malaria control tool. Furthermore, installing them in high-rise buildings can be cumbersome and risky. An S/O channel/grip device was, therefore, conceived to eliminate impediments to screening windows/openings in houses. Methods: Thin sheet metal strips were transformed into s-shaped channels. The lower ends provided for attachment to buildings while the upper ends allowed net attachments with O-rubber pipes. Effectiveness was ascertained by applying these to screen a room against adult Results: The device maintained a firmgrip of metal, fabric or natural nets placed on them. Over a 7-day period, 1036 mosquitoes could not enter rooms protected by either the novel or the traditional methods. Placement/removal of nets with the new device on experimental windows had a mean of 4.5/1 min, respectively, with all the nets intact, hence being reusable; whereas the traditional method had a mean of 4.25/8.75 min with all the nets torn/not-reusable. In high-rise buildings, employing ladders/scaffolds to mount nets were unnecessary: period of hoisting/removal on windows was 11/2 min irrespective of the location of windows whereas the traditional method hoisting period increased substantially as the height of the window increased. Conclusion: S/O channel/grip devices can improve mosquito control through screening because it engenders net hoisting on windows that is simple, effective, affordable, accessible and convenient, especially on high-rise buildings. The intact removal and recovery of used nets creates opportunities for cleaning them, retreatment with insecticide, regular maintenance, etc. which underline its potential roles in control of asthma and insect-borne diseases.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.