Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38836049›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Focusing on experts: Expectations of healthcare professionals regarding the use of telemedicine in intensive care units.

Magdalena Eitenberger, Gernot Gerger, Sophie Klomfar, Marcus Alexander Gabriel, Maria Kletecka-Pulker, Eva Schaden, Atanas G Atanasov, Mathias Maleczek, Sabine Völkl-Kernstock, Elisabeth Klager

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Magdalena EitenbergerLudwig Boltzmann Institute Digital Health and Patient Safety, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0216-387X
Gernot GergerLudwig Boltzmann Institute Digital Health and Patient Safety, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Sophie KlomfarLudwig Boltzmann Institute Digital Health and Patient Safety, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Marcus Alexander GabrielInstitute for Ethics and Law in Medicine, University of Vienna, Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6589-862X
Maria Kletecka-PulkerLudwig Boltzmann Institute Digital Health and Patient Safety, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Eva SchadenLudwig Boltzmann Institute Digital Health and Patient Safety, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Atanas G AtanasovLudwig Boltzmann Institute Digital Health and Patient Safety, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Mathias MaleczekLudwig Boltzmann Institute Digital Health and Patient Safety, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Sabine Völkl-KernstockLudwig Boltzmann Institute Digital Health and Patient Safety, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Elisabeth KlagerLudwig Boltzmann Institute Digital Health and Patient Safety, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0722-1255

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Telemedical applications are solutions to challenges in the healthcare system. However, it is unclear what intensive care unit healthcare professionals expect from such solutions. This study investigated the expectations and concerns of nurses and physicians when implementing telemedicine tools in intensive care units (tele-ICU). Methods: The study was conducted in intensive care units in 2020 during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. It used a mixed-methods approach targeted at physicians and nurses and involved 14 qualitative interviews and 63 quantitative questionnaires. Results: The qualitative and quantitative data showed that both nurses and physicians were willing to use tele-ICU. Nurses recognised the advantages of real-time access to expertise offered by tele-ICU, but feared this would reduce physicians' on-site patient time. Physicians, in turn, were concerned that they would be expected to be continuously on call. The majority in both groups agreed that any tele-ICU solution must be simple to use and integrate easily into existing organisational structures, networks, and work routines. Additionally, COVID-19 significantly influenced expectations: those who reported having more personal health concerns during the pandemic were more predisposed to favour the use of tele-ICU. Conclusions: Overall, tele-ICU supports better care, but a successful implementation depends on its ease of use and context-sensitive approaches. Effectively integrating tele-ICU solutions into daily clinical routines requires input from nurses and physicians and their involvement in the implementation process from the outset, as well as consideration of existing organisational structures. Such measures will vastly increase the chance of acceptance and successful adoption of telemedical solutions in clinical practice.

Indexed as

digital healthimplementationintensive care technologymixed-methodsTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID38836049
PMCPMC11149446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.