Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38835949›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in network physiology2024

Testing dynamic correlations and nonlinearity in bivariate time series through information measures and surrogate data analysis.

Helder Pinto, Ivan Lazic, Yuri Antonacci, Riccardo Pernice, Danlei Gu, Chiara Barà, Luca Faes, Ana Paula Rocha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in network physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Helder Pinto *Departamento de Matemática, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Ivan Lazic *Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Yuri AntonacciDepartment of Engineering, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Riccardo PerniceDepartment of Engineering, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Danlei GuBeijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China.
Chiara BaràDepartment of Engineering, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Luca Faes *Department of Engineering, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Ana Paula Rocha *Departamento de Matemática, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing availability of time series data depicting the evolution of physical system properties has prompted the development of methods focused on extracting insights into the system behavior over time, discerning whether it stems from deterministic or stochastic dynamical systems. Surrogate data testing plays a crucial role in this process by facilitating robust statistical assessments. This ensures that the observed results are not mere occurrences by chance, but genuinely reflect the inherent characteristics of the underlying system. The initial process involves formulating a null hypothesis, which is tested using surrogate data in cases where assumptions about the underlying distributions are absent. A discriminating statistic is then computed for both the original data and each surrogate data set. Significantly deviating values between the original data and the surrogate data ensemble lead to the rejection of the null hypothesis. In this work, we present various surrogate methods designed to assess specific statistical properties in random processes. Specifically, we introduce methods for evaluating the presence of autodependencies and nonlinear dynamics within individual processes, using Information Storage as a discriminating statistic. Additionally, methods are introduced for detecting coupling and nonlinearities in bivariate processes, employing the Mutual Information Rate for this purpose. The surrogate methods introduced are first tested through simulations involving univariate and bivariate processes exhibiting both linear and nonlinear dynamics. Then, they are applied to physiological time series of Heart Period (RR intervals) and respiratory flow (RESP) variability measured during spontaneous and paced breathing. Simulations demonstrated that the proposed methods effectively identify essential dynamical features of stochastic systems. The real data application showed that paced breathing, at low breathing rate, increases the predictability of the individual dynamics of RR and RESP and dampens nonlinearity in their coupled dynamics.

Indexed as

complex systemscouplinginformation storageinformation theorymutual information ratesurrogate analysis

Identifiers

PMID38835949
PMCPMC11148466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.