Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38835866›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024

Comparative study of urea-

Yiyuan Wu, Wenyuan Dong, Huan Zhong, Jixia Duan, Weidong Li, Chan Pu, Xin Li, Zexuan Xie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yiyuan WuCollege of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China.
Wenyuan DongInstitute of Qiong Bamboo, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming, China.
Huan ZhongInstitute of Qiong Bamboo, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming, China.
Jixia DuanCollege of forestry, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming, China.
Weidong LiCollege of forestry, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming, China.
Chan PuDaguan County Forestry and Grassland Bureau, Zhaotong, China.
Xin LiDaguan County Forestry and Grassland Bureau, Zhaotong, China.
Zexuan XieDaguan County Forestry and Grassland Bureau, Zhaotong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Bamboo is a globally significant plant with ecological, environmental, and economic bene-fits. Choosing suitable native tree species for mixed planting in bamboo forests is an effective measure for achieving both ecological and economic benefits of bamboo forests. However, little is currently known about the impact of bamboo forests on nitrogen cycling and utilization efficiency after mixing with other tree species. Therefore, our study aims to compare the nitrogen cycling in pure bamboo forests with that in mixed forests. Methods: Through field experiments, we investigated pure Results: The results demonstrated the following: 1) in both forest stands, bamboo culms account for the highest biomass percentage (42.99%-51.86%), while the leaves exhibited the highest nitrogen concentration and total nitrogen uptake (39.25%-44.52%/29.51%-33.21%, respectively) Additionally, the average nitrogen uptake rate of one-year-old bamboo is higher (0.25 mg kg Conclusion: These findings suggest that compared to pure bamboo forests, bamboo in mixed forests exhibits higher nitrogen recovery efficiency, particularly with one-year-old bamboo playing a crucial role.

Indexed as

15N tracing technologybamboo-broadleaf mixed forestsbiomassN recovery efficiencyQiongzhuea tumidinoda

Identifiers

PMID38835866
PMCPMC11148377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.