SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2024
Machine learning in the prediction of immunotherapy response and prognosis of melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Predictive value of serum biomarkers for survival in melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Pooled it
- Correlation does not equal causation: the imperative of causal inference in machine learning models for immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Decoding cancer with artificial intelligence: Transforming research, diagnosis, and therapy with future insights.Translational oncology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Genomic Data Analysis: New Frontiers in Precision Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Digital diagnostics, biomarkers and therapeutics in an evolving healthcare system: From promise to practice.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Review
- Leveraging Artificial Intelligence and Large Language Models for Cancer Immunotherapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Decoding immunotherapy response through computational modeling.Nature communications · 2026Review
- Immunotherapy in Melanoma: A Dynamic Frontier in Cancer Treatment : Author List.Current treatment options in oncology · 2026Review
- Machine Learning Analysis of Retrospective Data From 503 Hospitalized Older Patients With Type 2 Diabetes to Identify Factors Associated With Cognitive Impairment.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning-driven advancements in gastrointestinal cancer: Paving the way for precision medicine.World journal of gastroenterology · 2026Review
- AI-based neoadjuvant immunotherapy response prediction across pan-cancer: a comprehensive review.Cancer cell international · 2025Review
- Metastatic Melanoma Prognosis Prediction Using a TC Radiomic-Based Machine Learning Model: A Preliminary Study.Cancers · 2025Article
- Development and validation of machine learning model to predict early death of melanoma brain metastasis patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- MicroRNAs as key regulators of cancer drug resistance: insights and future directions in chemotherapy, targeted-therapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2025Review
- Enhancing Named Entity Recognition for immunology and immune-mediated disorders.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Exploration in association between vitamin D and cutaneous melanoma and explainable machine learning prediction.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The emergence of immunotherapy has changed the treatment modality for melanoma and prolonged the survival of many patients. However, a handful of patients remain unresponsive to immunotherapy and effective tools for early identification of this patient population are still lacking. Researchers have developed machine learning algorithms for predicting immunotherapy response in melanoma, but their predictive accuracy has been inconsistent. Therefore, the present systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to comprehensively evaluate the predictive accuracy of machine learning in melanoma response to immunotherapy. Methods: Relevant studies were searched in PubMed, Web of Sciences, Cochrane Library, and Embase from their inception to July 30, 2022. The risk of bias and applicability of the included studies were assessed using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST). Meta-analysis was performed on R4.2.0. Results: A total of 36 studies consisting of 30 cohort studies and 6 case-control studies were included. These studies were mainly published between 2019 and 2022 and encompassed 75 models. The outcome measures of this study were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment response. The pooled c-index was 0.728 (95%CI: 0.629-0.828) for PFS in the training set, 0.760 (95%CI: 0.728-0.792) and 0.819 (95%CI: 0.757-0.880) for treatment response in the training and validation sets, respectively, and 0.746 (95%CI: 0.721-0.771) and 0.700 (95%CI: 0.677-0.724) for OS in the training and validation sets, respectively. Conclusion: Machine learning has considerable predictive accuracy in melanoma immunotherapy response and prognosis, especially in the former. However, due to the lack of external validation and the scarcity of certain types of models, further studies are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.