Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38835654›Full record

ReviewPsychology research and behavior management2024

Exploring the Role of Machine Learning in Diagnosing and Treating Speech Disorders: A Systematic Literature Review.

Zaki Brahmi, Mohammad Mahyoob, Mohammed Al-Sarem, Jeehaan Algaraady, Khadija Bousselmi, Abdulaziz Alblwi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychology research and behavior management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Precision neuropsychology in the area of AI.Frontiers in psychology · 2025
    Article
  6. Artificial Intelligence in Communication Sciences and Disorders: Introduction to the Forum.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zaki BrahmiDepartment of Computer Science, Taibah University, Madina, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-0432-4817
Mohammad MahyoobDepartment of Languages and Translation, Taibah University, Madina, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-6664-1017
Mohammed Al-SaremDepartment of Computer Science, Taibah University, Madina, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-7172-8224
Jeehaan AlgaraadyDepartment of English, Taiz University, Taiz, Yemen.ORCID 0000-0003-3901-4648
Khadija BousselmiDepartment of Computer Science, LISTIC, University of Savoie Mont Blanc, Chambéry, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9477-3455
Abdulaziz AlblwiDepartment of Computer Science, Taibah University, Madina, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-5664-5145

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Speech disorders profoundly impact the overall quality of life by impeding social operations and hindering effective communication. This study addresses the gap in systematic reviews concerning machine learning-based assistive technology for individuals with speech disorders. The overarching purpose is to offer a comprehensive overview of the field through a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) and provide valuable insights into the landscape of ML-based solutions and related studies. Methods: The research employs a systematic approach, utilizing a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) methodology. The study extensively examines the existing literature on machine learning-based assistive technology for speech disorders. Specific attention is given to ML techniques, characteristics of exploited datasets in the training phase, speaker languages, feature extraction techniques, and the features employed by ML algorithms. Originality: This study contributes to the existing literature by systematically exploring the machine learning landscape in assistive technology for speech disorders. The originality lies in the focused investigation of ML-speech recognition for impaired speech disorder users over ten years (2014-2023). The emphasis on systematic research questions related to ML techniques, dataset characteristics, languages, feature extraction techniques, and feature sets adds a unique and comprehensive perspective to the current discourse. Findings: The systematic literature review identifies significant trends and critical studies published between 2014 and 2023. In the analysis of the 65 papers from prestigious journals, support vector machines and neural networks (CNN, DNN) were the most utilized ML technique (20%, 16.92%), with the most studied disease being Dysarthria (35/65, 54% studies). Furthermore, an upsurge in using neural network-based architectures, mainly CNN and DNN, was observed after 2018. Almost half of the included studies were published between 2021 and 2022).

Indexed as

assistive technologiesdysarthriamachine learningspeech disorderspeech recognition

Identifiers

PMID38835654
PMCPMC11149643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.