ReviewScience and technology of advanced materials2024
Recent advances in food waste-derived nanoporous carbon for energy storage.
Review in Science and technology of advanced materials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sustainable Ball Milling-Assisted Synthesis of Bread Waste-Derived Highly Porous Carbons for Adsorption-Based Applications.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2026Article
- Sustainable Energy Storage Systems: The Promise of Biomass-Derived Carbon Materials for High-Performance Supercapacitors.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Nanoporous Materials in Biomedical Research: Progress and Potential.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Waste-derived carbon nanomaterials for electrochemical applications: toward a circular and sustainable future.RSC advances · 2025Review
- Fascinating Frontier, Nanoarchitectonics, as Method for Everything in Materials Science.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- From Inception to Innovation: 20 Years of Nanoarchitectonics.Chemistry, an Asian journal · 2025Review
- Nanoarchitectonics for Pentagon Defects in Carbon: Properties and Catalytic Role in Oxygen Reduction Reaction.Small methods · 2025Review
- Dynamic Flow-Assisted Nanoarchitectonics.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025Review
- Layer-by-Layer Nanoarchitectonics: A Method for Everything in Layered Structures.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Affordable and environmentally friendly electrochemically active raw energy storage materials are in high demand to switch to mass-scale renewable energy. One particularly promising avenue is the feasibility of utilizing food waste-derived nanoporous carbon. This material holds significance due to its widespread availability, affordability, ease of processing, and, notably, its cost-free nature. Over the years, various strategies have been developed to convert different food wastes into nanoporous carbon materials with enhanced electrochemical properties. The electrochemical performance of these materials is influenced by both intrinsic factors, such as the composition of elements derived from the original food sources and recipes, and extrinsic factors, including the conditions during pyrolysis and activation. While current efforts are dedicated to optimizing process parameters to achieve superior performance in electrochemical energy storage devices, it is timely to take stock of the current state of research in this emerging field. This review provides a comprehensive overview of recent developments in the fabrication and surface characterisation of porous carbons from different food wastes. A special focus is given on the applications of these food waste derived porous carbons for energy storage applications including batteries and supercapacitors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.