ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Detection and comparison of tumor cell-associated microbiota from different compartments of colorectal cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The intratumoral microbiome in colorectal cancer: origins, microenvironmental interactions, and new horizons in precision medicine.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Article
- Chronic stress synergizes withFrontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Intratumoral microbes play an important role in the development of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, studying intratumoral microbes in CRC faces technical challenges, as tumor microbe communities are often contaminated by fecal microbes due to the structure of the gut folds and villi. The present study aimed to develop a new method for isolating tumor cell-associated microbiota and comparing microbial populations from different compartments. Materials and methods: The distribution of intestinal bacteria was detected using immunohistochemistry combined with 5R-16s rRNA gene sequencing to explore the effects of the sampling site and number of washes on the detection of microbiota. The 5R-16s rRNA gene sequencing was performed using 44 samples from 11 patients with CRC, including CRC tumor tissues (TT), normal tissues adjacent to CRC (NT), tumor cells (TC), and normal cells (NC). TC and NC were obtained from the TT and NT using an enzymatic digestion method. The microbiota and their potential functions in the four groups were analyzed and compared to determine the differential microbiota related to CRC. Results: Bacteria were mainly distributed in the feces covering intestinal tissues and in the epithelial cells and macrophages within the tissues. Different sampling sites and number of washes led to detection of different microbiota distributions. Although the cleaning method could be controlled, sampling sites varied and led to different microbiota distributions. The phyla of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes were highly abundant in the conventionally used tissue samples, whereas Proteobacteria was the most abundant phyla in the cell samples isolated with the new method (i.e., after cell enzymatic hydrolysis). Detection of CRC cell-associated microbiota using a cell enzymatic digestion method showed that some bacteria, such as Conclusion: The cell enzymatic digestion method reduced fecal bacterial contamination, enabling low biomass intratumoral microbiota to be detected and allowing prediction of bacterial distributions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.