Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38835369›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Prognostic factors in uterine adenosarcoma: subanalysis of the SARCUT study.

Rosanna Mancari, Yildirim Yusuf, Ronalds Macuks, Patriciu Achimas-Cadariu, Jurgen Martinus Piek, Isabella Sperduti, Giacomo Corrado, Enrico Vizza, Ignacio Zapardiel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rosanna MancariGynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Yildirim YusufGynecologic Oncology Department, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Türkiye.
Ronalds MacuksLatvian Oncology Center of Riga Eastern Clinical University Hospital, Riga, Latvia.
Patriciu Achimas-CadariuGynecologic Oncology Department, Institute of Oncology Prof. Dr. I Chiricuta, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Jurgen Martinus PiekGynecologic Oncology Department, Catharina Ziekenhuis Department of Gynecology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Isabella SperdutiUnit of Biostatistical, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Giacomo CorradoGynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Uni-versitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Enrico VizzaGynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Ignacio ZapardielGynecologic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of the study was to analyse the role of prognostic factors on the risk of recurrence and overall survival of patients with uterine adenosarcoma. Methods: A retrospective international multicentre study involving 46 centres collected 32 cases of uterine adenosarcoma, and these cases were included in the present subanalysis. Clinical and demographic features and tumour characteristics were gathered, as well as information on treatment and relapse. Disease-free and overall survival were analysed. Results: The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 85.3% and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 89.5%. The risk factors significantly associated with overall survival were age (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.03-1.15; Conclusion: The most significant prognostic factors in uterine adenosarcoma were age and FIGO stage and, indirectly, tumour size at diagnosis. The use of secondary surgery and/or radiotherapy could help in prolonging the disease-free status of the patients.

Indexed as

adenosarcomadisease-free survivalprognosissurvival rateuterine neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID38835369
PMCPMC11148341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.