Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38835368›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

A glutamatergic biomarker panel enables differentiating Grade 4 gliomas/astrocytomas from brain metastases.

Falko Lange, Richard Gade, Anne Einsle, Katrin Porath, Gesine Reichart, Claudia Maletzki, Björn Schneider, Christian Henker, Daniel Dubinski, Michael Linnebacher and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Falko LangeOscar-Langendorff-Institute of Physiology, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Richard GadeOscar-Langendorff-Institute of Physiology, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Anne EinsleOscar-Langendorff-Institute of Physiology, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Katrin PorathOscar-Langendorff-Institute of Physiology, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Gesine ReichartOscar-Langendorff-Institute of Physiology, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Claudia MaletzkiHematology, Oncology, Palliative Medicine, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Björn SchneiderInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Christian HenkerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Daniel DubinskiDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Michael LinnebacherMolecular Oncology and Immunotherapy, Clinic of General Surgery, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Rüdiger KöhlingOscar-Langendorff-Institute of Physiology, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Thomas M FreimanDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Timo KirschsteinOscar-Langendorff-Institute of Physiology, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The differentiation of high-grade glioma and brain tumors of an extracranial origin is eminent for the decision on subsequent treatment regimens. While in high-grade glioma, a surgical resection of the tumor mass is a fundamental part of current standard regimens, in brain metastasis, the burden of the primary tumor must be considered. However, without a cancer history, the differentiation remains challenging in the imaging. Hence, biopsies are common that may help to identify the tumor origin. An additional tool to support the differentiation may be of great help. For this purpose, we aimed to identify a biomarker panel based on the expression analysis of a small sample of tissue to support the pathological analysis of surgery resection specimens. Given that an aberrant glutamate signaling was identified to drive glioblastoma progression, we focused on glutamate receptors and key players of glutamate homeostasis. Methods: Based on surgically resected samples from 55 brain tumors, the expression of ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate receptors and key players of glutamate homeostasis were analyzed by RT-PCR. Subsequently, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to identify genes whose expression levels may be associated with either glioblastoma or brain metastasis. Results: Out of a total of 29 glutamatergic genes analyzed, nine genes presented a significantly different expression level between high-grade gliomas and brain metastases. Of those, seven were identified as potential biomarker candidates including genes encoding for AMPA receptors Conclusion: We have identified a panel of seven genes whose expression may serve as a biomarker panel to discriminate glioblastomas and brain metastases at the molecular level. After further validation, our biomarker signatures could be of great use in the decision making on subsequent treatment regimens after diagnosis.

Indexed as

biomarkerbrain metastasisepilepsyglioblastomaglutamateglutamate receptors

Identifiers

PMID38835368
PMCPMC11148222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.