ArticleThe journal of medicine access
Community pharmacists' treatment patterns and counselling of acute diarrhea in children: A simulation-based cross-sectional study.
Article in The journal of medicine access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diarrhea is a significant global health concern, particularly among children, and its impact is particularly pronounced in countries with limited resources and ongoing conflicts, such as Yemen. Diarrheal diseases remain one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in children under the age of 5 years worldwide. Objectives: The aim of our study is to assess the treatment patterns and counseling of community pharmacists regarding the management of acute diarrhea in children in Yemen. Design: A simulation-based cross-sectional study was carried out targeting community pharmacy professionals in Sana'a city. Methods: A questionnaire and simulated client methods were used to assess the pharmacists' evaluation of a case based on five indicators including the child's age, diarrhea frequency, presence of fever, and blood or mucus. In addition, the pharmacists' recommendations and counseling were also evaluated. Results: During the study, a total of 100 pharmacists were visited and evaluated using both a questionnaire and simulation. The results demonstrated that 43.0% of the pharmacists utilized all five indicators in the questionnaire, with a mere 3.0% using all five indicators in the simulation. Oral rehydration solution (ORS) alone was recommended by 42.0% of the pharmacists and in combination with other drugs by 47.0% in the questionnaire, and the rest (11.0%) recommended only other drugs; while in the simulation, 7.0% of the pharmacists referred the patients to clinic, only 6.0% recommended ORS alone, 47.0% gave ORS plus other drugs including antibiotics, and 40.0% dispensed only antibiotics. In regards to counseling, 89.0% of pharmacists reported that they would explain to the patient regarding the recommended medicine during the questionnaire, and only 36.0% gave any sort of explanation to the simulated client. Conclusion: In the current study, community pharmacists did not ask enough questions to accurately evaluate a child with acute diarrhea during the simulation. This finding has apparently differed from their responses in the questionnaire. Furthermore, the pharmacists failed to provide sufficient dietary advice, and their recommendation of ORS was inadequate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.