ArticleJournal of athletic training2024
Predictors of Concussion Symptom-Reporting Intention Among Collegiate Athletes.
Article in Journal of athletic training, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A global snapshot of the silent brain injury epidemic: A descriptive observational study of concussion coverage on YouTube.Health promotion perspectives · 2025Article
- Athletic Identity and Sport Injury Processes and Outcomes in Young Athletes: A Supplemental Narrative Review.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextUnderreporting of concussion symptoms in college athletics presents a challenge for sports medicine clinicians in evaluating and diagnosing such injuries. Some athletes do not report concussion symptoms because they do not recognize that they have a brain injury; however, many athletes intentionally withhold symptoms to avoid removal from sport participation.
objectiveTo examine individual factors that influence college athletes' intentions to report concussion symptoms.
designCross-sectional study.
settingCollegiate athletics. PATIENTS OR OTHER
participantsParticipants were 2649 student-athletes from 23 sports, across 22 colleges and universities. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcome was intention to report concussion symptoms. Predictor variables included demographics (age, race/ethnicity, sex, sport type, number of years in sport, number of previous concussions, and perceived concussion symptom knowledge), athletic identity, attitudes toward symptom reporting, perceived social pressure (injunctive and descriptive norms), and perceived behavioral control (capacity and autonomy).
resultsHierarchical ordinary least-squares regression revealed positive effects of attitude (b = 0.063, P = .005), descriptive norms (b = 0.131, P < .001), injunctive norms (b = 0.107, P < .001), and capacity (b = 0.196, P < .001) on intention to report symptoms. Athletic identity and participation in collision sports had small negative indirect effects on intention, and perceived concussion knowledge had a small positive indirect effect. The full regression model explained 14.24% of the variance in concussion-reporting intention.
conclusionsThese findings may help clinicians develop more focused interventions that address key social and individual determinants of underreporting, including attitude, injunctive and descriptive norms, and capacity to report. Athletic identity, sport type, and perceived understanding of concussion symptoms also influence reporting intention to a lesser extent. Previous research in this area has often failed to address a diverse population of college-age athletes from different sports and National Collegiate Athletic Association divisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.