ReviewKorean journal of medical education2024
Teaching clinical reasoning: principles from the literature to help improve instruction from the classroom to the bedside.
Review in Korean journal of medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- The PAPER heuristic: a structured cognitive aid to reduce intrinsic cognitive load in early clinical reasoning training.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- The Roozbehi Integrated Spiral Anatomy Model (R-ISAM): a five-phase framework for fully integrated anatomical sciences education.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Developing and Validating a Coding Scheme for Clinical Reasoning in History Taking Using Generative AI-Based Virtual Patients: Systematic Text Condensation Approach.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Enhancing diagnostic logic in high-acuity care: evidence from an online flipped classroom intervention in emergency medicine.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Script concordance test issues, the trail of expert calibration.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- AI Use for Medical Students: Impact on Clinical Skill Acquisition and Retention. A Systematic Review.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Review
- Facilitating clinical reasoning for medical students in clinical settings: a scoping review.Korean journal of medical education · 2025Article
- Undergraduate medical students' perceptions and perspectives on their clinical reasoning learning experiences.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Medical reasoning in LLMs: an in-depth analysis of DeepSeek R1.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Concept mapping to promote clinical reasoning in multimorbidity: a mixed methods study in undergraduate family medicine.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- An RQMN Integrated Teaching Model to Improve Clinical Competence in Undergraduate Internal Medicine Education: A Randomized Controlled Study.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical reasoning has been characterized as being an essential aspect of being a physician. Despite this, clinical reasoning has a variety of definitions and medical error, which is often attributed to clinical reasoning, has been reported to be a leading cause of death in the United States and abroad. Further, instructors struggle with teaching this essential ability which often does not play a significant role in the curriculum. In this article, we begin with defining clinical reasoning and then discuss four principles from the literature as well as a variety of techniques for teaching these principles to help ground an instructors' understanding in clinical reasoning. We also tackle contemporary challenges in teaching clinical reasoning such as the integration of artificial intelligence and strategies to help with transitions in instruction (e.g., from the classroom to the clinic or from medical school to residency/registrar training) and suggest next steps for research and innovation in clinical reasoning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.