Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38835102›Full record

ArticleTrials2024

Understanding the processes underpinning IMPlementing IMProved Asthma self-management as RouTine (IMP

J Sheringham, L Steed, K McClatchey, B Delaney, A Barat, V Hammersley, V Marsh, N J Fulop, S J C Taylor, H Pinnock

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

J SheringhamInstitute of Epidemiology and Health Care, UCL, London, WC1E 6BT, UK. j.sheringham@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3468-129X
L SteedWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
K McClatcheyUniversity of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
B DelaneySchool of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
A BaratWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
V HammersleyAsthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
V MarshAsthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
N J FulopInstitute of Epidemiology and Health Care, UCL, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
S J C TaylorWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
H PinnockAsthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

Programme Grants for Applied Research RP-PG-1016-20008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProviding supported self-management for people with asthma can reduce the burden on patients, health services and wider society. Implementation, however, remains poor in routine clinical practice. IMPlementing IMProved Asthma self-management as RouTine (IMP

methodsA mixed-methods process evaluation nested within the IMP DISCUSSION: This mixed-methods, theoretically informed, process evaluation seeks to provide insights into the delivery and response to a whole-systems approach to the implementation of supported self-management in asthma care in primary care. It is underway at a time of significant change in primary care in the UK. The methods have, therefore, been developed to be adaptable to this changing context and to capture the impact of these changes on the delivery and response to research and implementation processes.

Indexed as

AsthmaPrimary Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSelf-ManagementHumansProcess Assessment, Health CareSelf CareTreatment OutcomeUnited KingdomAsthmaIMP2ARTImplementationPrimary careProcess evaluationSelf-management

Identifiers

PMID38835102
PMCPMC11151520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.