ArticleGenome medicine2024
Optimizing clinico-genomic disease prediction across ancestries: a machine learning strategy with Pareto improvement.
Article in Genome medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bridging ancestry gaps in genomic risk prediction with tabular foundation models.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Bridging Ancestry Gaps in Genomic Risk Prediction with Tabular Foundation Models.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Equitable Health Intelligence: An Open Benchmark of Multi-Population Machine Learning for Omics-Based Cancer Prognosis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Omics-based Cancer Prognosis Across Ethnic Groups: From Feature Engineering to Disparity Detection and Mitigation.IEEE transactions on artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Data Representation Bias and Conditional Distribution Shift Drive Predictive Performance Disparities in Multi-Population Machine Learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Digital pathways connecting social and biological factors to health outcomes and equity.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Bridging Data Gaps in Healthcare: A Scoping Review of Transfer Learning in Structured Data Analysis.Health data science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate prediction of an individual's predisposition to diseases is vital for preventive medicine and early intervention. Various statistical and machine learning models have been developed for disease prediction using clinico-genomic data. However, the accuracy of clinico-genomic prediction of diseases may vary significantly across ancestry groups due to their unequal representation in clinical genomic datasets.
methodsWe introduced a deep transfer learning approach to improve the performance of clinico-genomic prediction models for data-disadvantaged ancestry groups. We conducted machine learning experiments on multi-ancestral genomic datasets of lung cancer, prostate cancer, and Alzheimer's disease, as well as on synthetic datasets with built-in data inequality and distribution shifts across ancestry groups.
resultsDeep transfer learning significantly improved disease prediction accuracy for data-disadvantaged populations in our multi-ancestral machine learning experiments. In contrast, transfer learning based on linear frameworks did not achieve comparable improvements for these data-disadvantaged populations.
conclusionsThis study shows that deep transfer learning can enhance fairness in multi-ancestral machine learning by improving prediction accuracy for data-disadvantaged populations without compromising prediction accuracy for other populations, thus providing a Pareto improvement towards equitable clinico-genomic prediction of diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.