Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38834931›Full record

ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2024

[Tabacco harm reduction: the need for a paradigm shift in German tobacco control policy].

Larissa Steimle, Meryem Grabski, Heino Stöver

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Larissa SteimleInstitut für Suchtforschung Frankfurt (ISFF), Fachbereich 4 "Soziale Arbeit und Gesundheit", Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences, Nibelungenplatz 1, 60318, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland. larissa.steimle@fb4.fra-uas.de.
Meryem GrabskiInstitut für Suchtforschung Frankfurt (ISFF), Fachbereich 4 "Soziale Arbeit und Gesundheit", Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences, Nibelungenplatz 1, 60318, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland.
Heino StöverInstitut für Suchtforschung Frankfurt (ISFF), Fachbereich 4 "Soziale Arbeit und Gesundheit", Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences, Nibelungenplatz 1, 60318, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The consumption of tobacco continues to be the greatest preventable health risk in Germany. Every year, more than 127,000 people die prematurely as a result of using tobacco - one in five new cases of cancer is a consequence of smoking. Germany's current tobacco control policy, consisting of advertising bans, the promotion of smoke-free environments, and an abstinence-only paradigm, are only able to initiate slow change. Other countries have shown how the number of smokers can be reduced and deaths prevented by integrating harm reduction as a complementary measure and providing a much more active support for people who want to quit. This article first presents the current situation and current measures in Germany. Then recommendations for changes to the current tobacco control policy in Germany are derived from a look at the United Kingdom, which is considered a pioneer throughout Europe with its tobacco control policy, as well as a summary of the current state of research.

Indexed as

Harm ReductionHealth PolicySmoking CessationSmoking PreventionGermanyHumansSmoke-Free PolicySmokingTobacco ControlDual useE‑cigarettesPublic health policySmokingSmoking cessation

Identifiers

PMID38834931
PMCPMC11281962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.