Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38834863›Full record

ArticleSpine deformity2024

Growth modulation response in vertebral body tethering depends primarily on magnitude of concave vertebral body growth.

Craig R Louer, Vidyadhar V Upasani, Jennifer K Hurry, Hui Nian, Christine L Farnsworth, Peter O Newton, Stefan Parent, Ron El-Hawary, Pediatric Spine Study Group (PSSG)

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Spine deformity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Craig R LouerDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2200 Childrens Way, Suite 4202, Nashville, TN, 37212, USA. Craig.louer@vumc.org.ORCID 0000-0003-4450-4502
Vidyadhar V UpasaniDepartment of Orthopedics, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, CA, USA.
Jennifer K HurryDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Hui NianDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2200 Childrens Way, Suite 4202, Nashville, TN, 37212, USA.
Christine L FarnsworthDepartment of Orthopedics, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, CA, USA.
Peter O NewtonDepartment of Orthopedics, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, CA, USA.
Stefan ParentDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universite´ de Montre´Al, Montre´Al, QC, Canada.
Ron El-HawaryDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Pediatric Spine Study Group (PSSG)

Funding

Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America 920442
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere is variability in clinical outcomes with vertebral body tethering (VBT) partly due to a limited understanding of the growth modulation (GM) response. We used the largest sample of patients with 3D spine reconstructions to characterize the vertebra and disc morphologic changes that accompany growth modulation during the first two years following VBT.

methodsA multicenter registry was used to identify idiopathic scoliosis patients who underwent VBT with 2 years of follow-up. Calibrated biplanar X-rays obtained at longitudinal timepoints underwent 3D reconstruction to obtain precision morphological measurements. GM was defined as change in instrumented coronal angulation from post-op to 2-years.

resultsFifty patients (mean age: 12.5 ± 1.3yrs) were analyzed over a mean of 27.7 months. GM was positively correlated with concave vertebra height growth (r = 0.57, p < 0.001), 3D spine length growth (r = 0.36, p = 0.008), and decreased convex disc height (r = - 0.42, p = 0.002). High modulators (patients experiencing GM > 10°) experienced an additional 1.6 mm (229% increase) of mean concave vertebra growth during study period compared to the Poor Modulators (GM < - 10°) group, (2.3 vs. 0.7 mm, p = 0.039), while convex vertebra height growth was similar (1.3 vs. 1.4 mm, p = 0.91).

conclusionWhen successful, VBT enables asymmetric vertebra body growth, leading to continued postoperative coronal angulation correction (GM). A strong GM response is correlated with concave vertebral body height growth and overall instrumented spine growth. A poor GM response is associated with an increase in convex disc height (suspected tether rupture). Future studies will investigate the patient and technique-specific factors that influence increased growth remodeling.

Indexed as

ScoliosisVertebral BodyAdolescentChildFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleSpinal FusionSpineTreatment Outcome3DGrowth modulationRemodelingScoliosisVertebral body tethering

Identifiers

PMID38834863
PMCPMC11499367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.