Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38834814›Full record

Trial reportEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2024

Surgical vs ultrasound-guided lumbar erector spinae plane block for pain management following lumbar spinal fusion surgery.

Ahmet Kaciroglu, Mursel Ekinci, Hande Gurbuz, Emre Ulusoy, Mehmet Ali Ekici, Özgür Dogan, Birzat Emre Golboyu, Selcuk Alver, Bahadir Ciftci

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07291388 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of Retrolaminar Block in Reducing Postoperative Opioid Consumption in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Fusion With Multimodal Analgesia

TypeinterventionalSponsorPontificia Universidad Catolica de ChileRan2026 to 2027Enrolled44ConditionsAcute Pain, Anesthesia, Lumbar Spine DiseaseArmsretrolaminar block, Sham block
NCT07454304 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided vs. Surgeon-Performed (Free-hand) Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Discectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedipol UniversityRan2022 to 2025Enrolled102ConditionsLumbar Disc Herniation, Lumbar Disc DiseaseArmsUS-guided ESPB., Surgeon-performed (Free-hand) ESPB.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Letter to the Editor concerning "Surgical vs ultrasound-guided lumbar erector spinae plane block for pain management following lumbar spinal fusion surgery".European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  5. Answer to the letter to the editor of Q. Zhou, et al. concerning "Surgical vs ultrasound-guided lumbar erector spinae plane block for pain management following lumbar spinal fusion surgery" by Kaciroglu A, et al. (Eur Spine J [2024]: doi 10.1007/s00586-024-08347-x).European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ahmet KacirogluDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Bursa City Hospital, Sciences Bursa Faculty of Medicine, University of Health, 16110, Bursa, Nilufer, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-8911-2225
Mursel EkinciDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Bursa City Hospital, Sciences Bursa Faculty of Medicine, University of Health, 16110, Bursa, Nilufer, Turkey. drmurselekinci@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5580-5960
Hande GurbuzDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Bursa City Hospital, Sciences Bursa Faculty of Medicine, University of Health, 16110, Bursa, Nilufer, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-3562-9517
Emre UlusoyDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Bursa City Hospital, Sciences Bursa Faculty of Medicine, University of Health, 16110, Bursa, Nilufer, Turkey.ORCID 0009-0002-2009-5791
Mehmet Ali EkiciDepartment of Neurosurgery, Bursa City Hospital, University of Health Sciences Bursa Faculty of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-0035-4867
Özgür DoganDepartment of Neurosurgery, Bursa City Hospital, University of Health Sciences Bursa Faculty of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-1291-6572
Birzat Emre GolboyuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-2011-2574
Selcuk AlverDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-4739-6623
Bahadir CiftciDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-3245-6614

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSpinal surgery is associated with severe diffuse pain in the postoperative period. Effective pain management plays an essential role in reducing morbidity and mortality. This study is designed to compare the ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block and surgical infiltrative ESP block for postoperative analgesia management after lumbar spinal fusion surgery.

methodsThe patients who underwent two or three levels of posterior lumbar spinal fusion surgery were randomly allocated into one of three groups with 30 patients each (Group SE = Surgical ESP block; Group UE = ultrasound-guided ESP block; Group C = Controls). The primary aim was to compare postoperative opioid consumption, and the secondary aim was to evaluate postoperative dynamic and static pain scores and the incidence of opioid-related adverse effects.

resultsThere was a significant difference in terms of opioid consumption, rescue analgesia on demand, and both static and dynamic pain scores between groups at all time periods (p < 0.05). Group SE and Group UE had lower pain scores and consumed fewer opioids than the controls (p < 0.05). However, the Group UE had lower pain scores and opioid consumption than the Group SE. The sedation level of patients was significantly higher in the control group than in the other two groups. Also, nausea was more common in controls than in the other groups.

conclusionWhile both surgical and ultrasound-guided ESP blocks reduced opioid consumption compared to the controls, the patients who received ultrasound-guided ESP blocks experienced better postsurgical pain relief than those in the other groups (surgical ESP and controls).

Indexed as

Lumbar VertebraeNerve BlockPostoperative PainSpinal FusionUltrasonography, InterventionalAdultAgedAnalgesics, OpioidFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain ManagementPain MeasurementParaspinal MusclesAnalgesics, OpioidErector spina plan blockLumbar spinal fusion surgeryMultimodal analgesiaPostoperative analgesia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.