ArticlePediatric research2024
Assessment of extremely premature lambs supported by the Extrauterine Environment for Neonatal Development (EXTEND).
Article in Pediatric research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Womb Technology for Extremely Premature Neonates: Preclinical Neurodevelopmental Outcomes.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Experimental Impact of Increasing Circuit Resistance in the Artificial Womb.Prenatal diagnosis · 2025Article
- Chronic Hypoxia in an EXTrauterine Environment for Neonatal Development Impairs Lung Development.American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology · 2025Article
- Artificial womb technology - A more physiologic solution to treating extreme prematurity.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2025Review
- Fetal heart and surroundings: umbilical cord traction triggers sympathetic heart rate surge in fetal lambs in the artificial womb.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOur team has previously reported physiologic support by the EXTra-uterine Environment for Neonatal Development (EXTEND) of 105 to 117 days gestational age (GA) lambs for up to 28 days with normal organ maturation. However, the fetal lamb brain matures more rapidly, requiring the study of 90-105 day GA fetal lambs to assess more neurodevelopmentally equivalent lambs to the 23-25 week GA extreme premature infant.
methodsExtremely preterm lambs (90-95 days of GA) were delivered by C-section and supported by EXTEND. Estimated circuit flows were maintained at around 325 ml/kg/min. After support on EXTEND, MRI and histopathologic analysis were performed and compared to 105-112 days GA control lambs.
resultsThe extremely preterm group includes 10 animals with a mean GA of 91.6 days, a mean weight at cannulation of 0.98 kg and a mean length of stay on EXTEND of 13.5 days (10-21 days). Hemodynamics and oxygenation showed stable parameters. Animals showed growth and physiologic cardiac function. MRI volumetric and diffusion analysis was comparable to controls. Histologic brain analysis revealed no difference between study groups.
conclusionEXTEND appears to support brain and cardiac development in an earlier gestation, less mature, lamb model. IMPACT: Prolonged (up to 21 days) physiological support of extremely preterm lambs of closer neurodevelopmental equivalence to the 24-28 gestational week human was achieved using the EXTEND system. EXTEND treatment supported brain growth and development in extremely preterm fetal lambs and was not associated with intraventricular hemorrhage or white matter injury. Daily echocardiography demonstrated physiologic heart function, absence of cardiac afterload, and normal developmental increase in cardiac chamber dimensions. This study demonstrates hemodynamic and metabolic support by the EXTEND system in the extremely preterm ovine model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.