ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2024
Leveraging federated learning for boosting data privacy and performance in IVF embryo selection.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Implementation readiness of artificial intelligence inFrontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo study the effectiveness of federated learning in in vitro fertilization on embryo evaluation tasks.
methodsThis is a retrospective cohort analysis. Two datasets were used in this study. The ploidy status dataset consisted of 10,065 embryo records, 3760 treatments, and 2479 infertile couples from 5 hospitals. The clinical pregnancy dataset consisted of 4495 embryo records, 4495 treatments, and 3704 infertile couples from 4 hospitals. Federated learning and the gradient boosting decision tree algorithm were utilized for modeling.
resultsOn the ploidy status dataset, the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of our model trained with federated learning were 71.78%, 73.10%, 69.39%, 69.72%, and 73.46% for 5 hospitals respectively, showing an average increase of 2.5% compared to those of our model trained without federated learning. On the clinical pregnancy dataset, the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of our model trained with federated learning were 72.03%, 56.77%, 61.63%, and 58.58% for 4 hospitals respectively, showing an average increase of 3.08%.
conclusionsFederated learning can improve data privacy and data security and meanwhile improve the performance of embryo selection tasks by leveraging data from multiple sources. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of federated learning in embryo evaluation, and the results show the promise for future application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.