Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38834742›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of cancer2024

Why does circadian timing of administration matter for immune checkpoint inhibitors' efficacy?

Abdoulaye Karaboué, Pasquale F Innominato, Nicholas I Wreglesworth, Boris Duchemann, René Adam, Francis A Lévi

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07338981 (), which is not on this map. Cited by 61 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07338981 phase3not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

(CHRONO-RCC) Time-of-day-Dependent Administration of Dual Immune Check Point Inhibitors (ICI) in Advanced Kidney Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorGuliz OzgunRan2026 to 2032Enrolled142ConditionsAdvanced Kidney CancerArmsNivolumab & Ipilimumab, Nivolumab + Ipilimumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Timing matters: how mechanism-guided sequencing shapes the efficacy of radiotherapy-immunotherapy combinations : A systematic review.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Abdoulaye KarabouéUPR "Chronotherapy, Cancer and Transplantation", Medical School, Paris-Saclay University, 94800, Villejuif, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2074-2557
Pasquale F InnominatoNorth Wales Cancer Centre, Ysbyty Gwynedd, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Bangor, LL57 2PW, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0653-8261
Nicholas I WreglesworthNorth Wales Cancer Centre, Ysbyty Gwynedd, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Bangor, LL57 2PW, UK.
Boris DuchemannUPR "Chronotherapy, Cancer and Transplantation", Medical School, Paris-Saclay University, 94800, Villejuif, France.
René AdamUPR "Chronotherapy, Cancer and Transplantation", Medical School, Paris-Saclay University, 94800, Villejuif, France.
Francis A LéviUPR "Chronotherapy, Cancer and Transplantation", Medical School, Paris-Saclay University, 94800, Villejuif, France. francis.levi@universite-paris-saclay.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1364-7463

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTolerability and antitumour efficacy of chemotherapy and radiation therapy can vary largely according to their time of administration along the 24-h time scale, due to the moderation of their molecular and cellular mechanisms by circadian rhythms. Recent clinical data have highlighted a striking role of dosing time for cancer immunotherapy, thus calling for a critical evaluation.

methodsHere, we review the clinical data and we analyse the mechanisms through which circadian rhythms can influence outcomes on ICI therapies. We examine how circadian rhythm disorders can affect tumour immune microenvironment, as a main mechanism linking the circadian clock to the 24-h cycles in ICIs antitumour efficacy.

resultsReal-life data from 18 retrospective studies have revealed that early time-of-day (ToD) infusion of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) could enhance progression-free and/or overall survival up to fourfold compared to late ToD dosing. The studies involved a total of 3250 patients with metastatic melanoma, lung, kidney, bladder, oesophageal, stomach or liver cancer from 9 countries. Such large and consistent differences in ToD effects on outcomes could only result from a previously ignored robust chronobiological mechanism. The circadian timing system coordinates cellular, tissue and whole-body physiology along the 24-h timescale. Circadian rhythms are generated at the cellular level by a molecular clock system that involves 15 specific clock genes. The disruption of circadian rhythms can trigger or accelerate carcinogenesis, and contribute to cancer treatment failure, possibly through tumour immune evasion resulting from immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment. CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVE: Such emerging understanding of circadian rhythms regulation of antitumour immunity now calls for randomised clinical trials of ICIs timing to establish recommendations for personalised chrono-immunotherapies with current and forthcoming drugs.

Indexed as

Circadian RhythmImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsNeoplasmsTumor MicroenvironmentCircadian ClocksDrug Administration ScheduleHumansImmunotherapyImmune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID38834742
PMCPMC11369086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.