ArticleScientific reports2024
Applying an explainable machine learning model might reduce the number of negative appendectomies in pediatric patients with a high probability of acute appendicitis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning-Predicted Length of Hospital Stay in Pediatric Appendicitis: An Exploratory Comparative Study of Clinical and Ultrasound-Based Models with Explainable Artificial Intelligence and Bayesian Analysis.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Explainable Machine Learning for Predicting Complicated Appendicitis and Expected Hospital Length of Stay in Children: An Exploratory Single-Center Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Research on the construction of an artificial intelligence model for the early diagnosis of pediatric acute appendicitis: a single-center retrospective study based on complete blood count.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Usefulness of Laboratory-Based Machine Learning for Detection and Severity Classification of Acute Appendicitis in a Resource-Limited Healthcare Setting.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Latest Developments in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Models in General Pediatric Surgery.European journal of pediatric surgery : official journal of Austrian Association of Pediatric Surgery ... [et al] = Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie · 2026Review
- Applications of artificial intelligence in pediatric general surgery: a systematic review.Translational pediatrics · 2026Review
- A hybrid machine learning approach to improve the diagnostic accuracy of acute appendicitis.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026Article
- Understanding and applying machine learning in differentiating abdominal IgA vasculitis without purpura from appendicitis.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of acute and complicated appendicitis using readily available data in low-resource settings.PloS one · 2026Article
- Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques in the Treatment of Appendicitis: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in acute appendicitis: A comprehensive review of machine learning and deep learning applications.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Detecting pancreaticobiliary maljunction in pediatric congenital choledochal malformation patients using machine learning methods.BMC surgery · 2025Article
- Role of immature granulocyte and blood biomarkers in predicting perforated acute appendicitis using machine learning model.World journal of clinical cases · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of a Machine Learning-Derived Appendicitis Score in Children: A Multicenter Validation Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluating Ensemble-Based Machine Learning Models for Diagnosing Pediatric Acute Appendicitis: Insights from a Retrospective Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Leveraging Machine Learning for Pediatric Appendicitis Diagnosis: A Retrospective Study Integrating Clinical, Laboratory, and Imaging Data.Health science reports · 2025Article
- A Systematic Integration of Artificial Intelligence Models in Appendicitis Management: A Comprehensive Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Acute Appendicitis or Appendiceal Diverticulitis? A Case Report and Systematic Literature Review.Clinics and practice · 2025Review
- Diagnostic value of the MZXBTCH scoring system for acute complex appendicitis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Machine-learning based prediction of appendicitis for patients presenting with acute abdominal pain at the emergency department.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diagnosis of acute appendicitis and concurrent surgery referral is primarily based on clinical presentation, laboratory and radiological imaging. However, utilizing such an approach results in as much as 10-15% of negative appendectomies. Hence, in the present study, we aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model designed to reduce the number of negative appendectomies in pediatric patients with a high clinical probability of acute appendicitis. The model was developed and validated on a registry of 551 pediatric patients with suspected acute appendicitis that underwent surgical treatment. Clinical, anthropometric, and laboratory features were included for model training and analysis. Three machine learning algorithms were tested (random forest, eXtreme Gradient Boosting, logistic regression) and model explainability was obtained. Random forest model provided the best predictions achieving mean specificity and sensitivity of 0.17 ± 0.01 and 0.997 ± 0.001 for detection of acute appendicitis, respectively. Furthermore, the model outperformed the appendicitis inflammatory response (AIR) score across most sensitivity-specificity combinations. Finally, the random forest model again provided the best predictions for discrimination between complicated appendicitis, and either uncomplicated acute appendicitis or no appendicitis at all, with a joint mean sensitivity of 0.994 ± 0.002 and specificity of 0.129 ± 0.009. In conclusion, the developed ML model might save as much as 17% of patients with a high clinical probability of acute appendicitis from unnecessary surgery, while missing the needed surgery in only 0.3% of cases. Additionally, it showed better diagnostic accuracy than the AIR score, as well as good accuracy in predicting complicated acute appendicitis over uncomplicated and negative cases bundled together. This may be useful in centers that advocate for the conservative treatment of uncomplicated appendicitis. Nevertheless, external validation is needed to support these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.