Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38834671›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Applying an explainable machine learning model might reduce the number of negative appendectomies in pediatric patients with a high probability of acute appendicitis.

Ivan Males, Zvonimir Boban, Marko Kumric, Josip Vrdoljak, Karlotta Berkovic, Zenon Pogorelic, Josko Bozic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Latest Developments in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Models in General Pediatric Surgery.European journal of pediatric surgery : official journal of Austrian Association of Pediatric Surgery ... [et al] = Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. A hybrid machine learning approach to improve the diagnostic accuracy of acute appendicitis.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ivan MalesDepartment of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital of Split, Spinciceva 1, 21000, Split, Croatia.
Zvonimir BobanDepartment of Medical Physics and Biophysics, School of Medicine, University of Split, Soltanska 2A, 21000, Split, Croatia.
Marko KumricDepartment of Pathophysiology, School of Medicine, University of Split, Soltanska 2A, 21000, Split, Croatia.
Josip VrdoljakDepartment of Pathophysiology, School of Medicine, University of Split, Soltanska 2A, 21000, Split, Croatia.
Karlotta BerkovicDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Split, Soltanska 2A, 21000, Split, Croatia.
Zenon PogorelicDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Split, Soltanska 2A, 21000, Split, Croatia. zenon.pogorelic@mefst.hr.
Josko BozicDepartment of Medical Physics and Biophysics, School of Medicine, University of Split, Soltanska 2A, 21000, Split, Croatia. josko.bozic@mefst.hr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnosis of acute appendicitis and concurrent surgery referral is primarily based on clinical presentation, laboratory and radiological imaging. However, utilizing such an approach results in as much as 10-15% of negative appendectomies. Hence, in the present study, we aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model designed to reduce the number of negative appendectomies in pediatric patients with a high clinical probability of acute appendicitis. The model was developed and validated on a registry of 551 pediatric patients with suspected acute appendicitis that underwent surgical treatment. Clinical, anthropometric, and laboratory features were included for model training and analysis. Three machine learning algorithms were tested (random forest, eXtreme Gradient Boosting, logistic regression) and model explainability was obtained. Random forest model provided the best predictions achieving mean specificity and sensitivity of 0.17 ± 0.01 and 0.997 ± 0.001 for detection of acute appendicitis, respectively. Furthermore, the model outperformed the appendicitis inflammatory response (AIR) score across most sensitivity-specificity combinations. Finally, the random forest model again provided the best predictions for discrimination between complicated appendicitis, and either uncomplicated acute appendicitis or no appendicitis at all, with a joint mean sensitivity of 0.994 ± 0.002 and specificity of 0.129 ± 0.009. In conclusion, the developed ML model might save as much as 17% of patients with a high clinical probability of acute appendicitis from unnecessary surgery, while missing the needed surgery in only 0.3% of cases. Additionally, it showed better diagnostic accuracy than the AIR score, as well as good accuracy in predicting complicated acute appendicitis over uncomplicated and negative cases bundled together. This may be useful in centers that advocate for the conservative treatment of uncomplicated appendicitis. Nevertheless, external validation is needed to support these findings.

Indexed as

AppendectomyAppendicitisMachine LearningAcute DiseaseAdolescentAlgorithmsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleProbabilitySensitivity and SpecificityAcute appendicitisAppendectomyChildrenMachine learningPediatric surgery

Identifiers

PMID38834671
PMCPMC11150468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.