Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38834640›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

No free lunch for avoiding clustering vulnerabilities in distributed systems.

Pheerawich Chitnelawong, Andrei A Klishin, Norman Mackay, David J Singer, Greg van Anders

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pheerawich ChitnelawongDepartment of Physics, Engineering Physics, and Astronomy, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Andrei A KlishinDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Norman MackayDepartment of Physics, Engineering Physics, and Astronomy, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.
David J SingerDepartment of Naval Architecture Marine Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Greg van AndersDepartment of Physics, Engineering Physics, and Astronomy, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada. gva@queensu.ca.

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2019-05655Office of Naval Research N00014-17-1-2491
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emergent design failures are ubiquitous in complex systems, and often arise when system elements cluster. Approaches to systematically reduce clustering could improve a design's resilience, but reducing clustering is difficult if it is driven by collective interactions among design elements. Here, we use techniques from statistical physics to identify mechanisms by which spatial clusters of design elements emerge in complex systems modelled by heterogeneous networks. We find that, in addition to naive, attraction-driven clustering, heterogeneous networks can exhibit emergent, repulsion-driven clustering. We draw quantitative connections between our results on a model system in naval engineering to entropy-driven phenomena in nanoscale self-assembly, and give a general argument that the clustering phenomena we observe should arise in many distributed systems. We identify circumstances under which generic design problems will exhibit trade-offs between clustering and uncertainty in design objectives, and we present a framework to identify and quantify trade-offs to manage clustering vulnerabilities.

Identifiers

PMID38834640
PMCPMC11150256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.