ArticleScientific data2024
Publication, funding, and experimental data in support of Human Reference Atlas construction and usage.
Article in Scientific data, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- DigitAb: Domain-Adaptive Cell Type Prediction Method from Light Microscopy Images.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A general strategy for generating expert-guided, simplified views of ontologies.Scientific data · 2026Article
- A general strategy for generating expert-guided, simplified views of ontologies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Construction, Deployment, and Usage of the Human Reference Atlas Knowledge Graph.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Human BioMolecular Atlas Program (HuBMAP): 3D Human Reference Atlas construction and usage.Nature methods · 2025Article
- Construction, Deployment, and Usage of the Human Reference Atlas Knowledge Graph for Linked Open Data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Human BioMolecular Atlas Program (HuBMAP): 3D Human Reference Atlas Construction and Usage.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Experts from 18 consortia are collaborating on the Human Reference Atlas (HRA) which aims to map the 37 trillion cells in the healthy human body. Information relevant for HRA construction and usage is held by experts, published in scholarly papers, and captured in experimental data. However, these data sources use different metadata schemas and cannot be cross-searched efficiently. This paper documents the compilation of a dataset, named HRAlit, that links the 136 HRA v1.4 digital objects (31 organs with 4,279 anatomical structures, 1,210 cell types, 2,089 biomarkers) to 583,117 experts; 7,103,180 publications; 896,680 funded projects, and 1,816 experimental datasets. The resulting HRAlit has 22 tables with 20,939,937 records including 6 junction tables with 13,170,651 relationships. The HRAlit can be mined to identify leading experts, major papers, funding trends, or alignment with existing ontologies in support of systematic HRA construction and usage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.