Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38834515›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary science2024

Effectiveness of cephalosporins in hydrolysis and inhibition of

Jawaria Aslam, Hafiz Muhammad Ali, Shujaat Hussain, Muhammad Zishan Ahmad, Abu Baker Siddique, Muhammad Shahid, Mirza Imran Shahzad, Hina Fatima, Sarah Tariq, Fatima Sadiq and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Synergistic potential of LeuBMC microbiology · 2024
    Article
  3. Antimicrobial Activity ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jawaria AslamDepartment of Physiology and Biochemistry, Cholistan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Bahawalpur 63100, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7562-3830
Hafiz Muhammad AliFaculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur 63100, Pakistan. hmali_uaf@iub.edu.pk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9885-5933
Shujaat HussainPMAS Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi 46300, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0567-1255
Muhammad Zishan AhmadPMAS Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi 46300, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2643-9049
Abu Baker SiddiqueInstitute of Microbiology, Government College University, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8589-2292
Muhammad ShahidDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan. mshahiduaf@yahoo.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9100-6365
Mirza Imran ShahzadCenter for Comparative Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0544-4455
Hina FatimaDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5959-5158
Sarah TariqDepartment of Biochemistry, Institute of Biochemistry, Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur 63100, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7400-3157
Fatima SadiqDepartment of Biochemistry, Institute of Biochemistry, Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur 63100, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4084-5214
Maria AslamDepartment of Computer Science, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur 63100, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5376-013X
Umar FarooqDepartment of Physiology and Biochemistry, Cholistan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Bahawalpur 63100, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1081-4677
Saadiya ZiaDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2265-0667
Rawa Saad AljaluodDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6536-9912
Khaloud Mohammed AlarjaniDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3762-1498

Funding

King Saud University RSP2024R185
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importance

objectiveThe study examined the efficacy of various generations of cephalosporins against biofilms developed by pathogenic

methodsThe development of biofilms by both bacteria was assessed using petri-plate and microplate methods. Biofilm hydrolysis and inhibition were tested using first to fourth generations of cephalosporins, and the effects were analyzed by crystal violet staining and phase contrast microscopy.

resultsBoth bacterial strains exhibited well-developed biofilms in petri-plate and microplate assays. Cefradine (first generation) showed 76.78% hydrolysis of CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Cephalosporins exhibit dual capabilities of hydrolyzing and inhibiting

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsCephalosporinsEscherichia coliStaphylococcus aureusHydrolysisMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCephalosporinsbiofilm inhibitionCephalosporinsEscherichia colihydrolysisStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID38834515
PMCPMC11156599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.